ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2024
Case detection of familial hypercholesterolemia using various criteria during an annual health examination in the workplace.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment of subjects with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) could prevent cardiovascular disease (CAD). Objective: We aimed to identify potential cases of FH during a workplace screening and to explore their clinical data. Method: Personnel who attended an annual health examination were invited to answer a questionnaire and to provide consent to review their laboratory results. FH was clinically diagnosed using any one of the three standard criteria: Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN), Simon Broome (SB), and Make Early Diagnosis to Prevent Early Deaths (MEDPED). Clinical characteristics were compared between FH and unlikely FH subjects. Results: Among 6607 participants, potential cases of FH were identified in 2.5 % by DLCN, 4.0 % by SB, and 0.8 % by MEDPED alone. Premature CAD, hypertension, and current smoking were significantly more common in potential FH subjects than in unlikely FH subjects. Potential FH subjects also had significantly higher body mass index, waist circumference, blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose and triglyceride levels than unlikely FH subjects. Among potential FH subjects, lipid-lowering medication was used in 28.4 %. The achievement of the LDL-C goal (<100 mg/dL) in potential FH subjects was significantly lower than that in unlikely FH subjects (15 % vs. 28 %, respectively, P = 0.005) despite a higher rate of high-intensity statin use (25 % vs. 10 %, respectively, P = 0.002). Conclusion: The workplace screening of FH detected a significant number of potential FH subjects with higher cardiovascular risk. This strategy identified individuals for whom intensification of both lifestyle modifications and pharmacological treatment should be a priority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.