Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39570827›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Emotional, physiological, biochemical, and behavioral responses to acute stress and uncertainty in military personnel.

Julie A Cantelon, Ester Navarro, Tad T Brunyé, Marianna D Eddy, Nathan Ward, Ida Pantoja-Feliciano, Jordan Whitman, Manob Jyoti Saikia, Grace E Giles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Julie A CantelonU.S. Army DEVCOM Soldier Center, Natick, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8374-670X
Ester NavarroCenter for Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Tad T BrunyéU.S. Army DEVCOM Soldier Center, Natick, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Marianna D EddyU.S. Army DEVCOM Soldier Center, Natick, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Nathan WardCenter for Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8894-7087
Ida Pantoja-FelicianoU.S. Army DEVCOM Soldier Center, Natick, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Jordan WhitmanU.S. Army DEVCOM Soldier Center, Natick, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Manob Jyoti SaikiaCenter for Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Grace E GilesU.S. Army DEVCOM Soldier Center, Natick, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stress carries diverse implications for perceptual, cognitive, and affective functions. One population particularly susceptible to acute stress-induced cognitive changes are individuals with high-stress jobs (e.g., military personnel). These individuals are often tasked with maintaining peak cognitive performance, including memory, spatial navigation, and decision-making under threatening and uncertain conditions. Previous research has separately examined decision-making under conditions of stress or uncertainty (i.e., ambiguous discrimination between friends and foes). However, questions remain about how operationally relevant stress impacts memory encoding and recall, or spatial learning, as well as how uncertainty may impact decision-making during stress. To address this gap, we examined the influence of a military-relevant emotional stressor on a series of cognitive tasks including recognition memory task (RMT), spatial orienting task (SOT), and shoot/don't shoot decision making (DMT). To examine the effects of uncertainty and stress we varied the stimulus clarity in the DMT. We utilized threat of shock (TOS) as a high-stakes outcome for decision errors. TOS increased sympathetic arousal but did not affect subjective emotional or HPA responses. TOS influenced decision times and confidence ratings in the DMT, but not response sensitivity or response bias. DMT performance varied by stimulus clarity (uncertainty) but did not differ between stress conditions. TOS did not influence recognition memory or spatial orienting. In sum, high levels of stress and uncertainty characterize military operations, yet stress experienced in military contexts can be difficult to induce in laboratory settings. We discuss several avenues for future research, including methodological considerations to better assess the magnitude and specificity of emotional stress-induction techniques in Soldiers.

Indexed as

Decision MakingEmotionsMilitary PersonnelStress, PsychologicalAdultCognitionFemaleHumansHydrocortisoneMaleUncertaintyYoung AdultHydrocortisone

Identifiers

PMID39570827
PMCPMC11581281

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.