Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39570934›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Comparing dual oral agents plus insulin vs. Triple oral agents in uncontrolled type II diabetes: A pilot study.

Nadia Gul, Inayat Ur Rehman, Yasar Shah, Arbab Muhammad Ali, Zahid Ali, Omer Shehzad, Khang Wen Goh, Long Chiau Ming, Amal K Suleiman

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nadia GulDepartment of Pharmacy, Garden Campus, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, Pakistan.
Inayat Ur RehmanDepartment of Pharmacy, Garden Campus, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, Pakistan.ORCID 0009-0000-4325-7293
Yasar ShahDepartment of Pharmacy, Garden Campus, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-9354-8187
Arbab Muhammad AliDepartment of Nephrology, Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Zahid AliDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Omer ShehzadDepartment of Pharmacy, Garden Campus, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, Pakistan.
Khang Wen GohFaculty of Data Science and Information Technology, INTI International University, Nilai, Malaysia.
Long Chiau MingSchool of Medical and Life Sciences, Sunway University, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia.
Amal K SuleimanDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Clinical Pharmacy, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionType II Diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients often do not achieve glycemic control with oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs). There are two main approaches to address this challenge: transitioning to a triple OHA regimen, or adding Insulin to the existing dual OHA regimen.

aimThis study aimed to compare the efficacy of adding Insulin to dual OHAs (Sitagliptin + Metformin) against adding a third OHA to Sitagliptin + Metformin in achieving glycemic control among patients with uncontrolled T2DM.

methodA pre-post study was conducted between 21 September 2023 and 21 December 2023 at Services Hospital Peshawar, Pakistan. Patients with uncontrolled T2DM with >7% HbA1c were divided into group 1 (Sitagliptin + Metformin plus a third OHA), and group 2 (Sitagliptin + Metformin plus pre-mixed Insulin 70/30). Glycemic control based on HbA1c values, fasting and random blood sugar levels, lipid profile, and body weight were evaluated after 3 months of therapy. The pre- and post- effect was compared by using a paired t-test.

resultsThe study included n = 80 patients with T2DM. Between groups 1 and 2, no significant difference was found in HbA1c values (9.1 vs. 9, with p = 0.724). However, BMI, cholesterol, and LDL significantly decreased in group 1 compared to group 2 (p<0.001 vs. p = 0.131, p = 0.023 vs. p = 0.896, and p = 0.003 vs. p = 0.395, respectively). Additionally, the incidence of hypoglycemic episodes was significantly lower in group 1 (7.5%) than in group 2 (47.5%, p = 0.004). No significant difference was observed between the triple OHA and dual OHA plus Insulin regimens in achieving glycemic control.

conclusionThe triple OHA regimen improved BMI, cholesterol, and LDL levels, and reduced hypoglycemic episodes more effectively than dual OHA plus Insulin, despite similar HbA1c outcomes, suggesting it may be preferable for uncontrolled T2DM.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Drug Therapy, CombinationGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMetforminSitagliptin PhosphateAdministration, OralAdultAgedBlood GlucoseFemaleGlycemic ControlHumansMaleMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMetforminSitagliptin Phosphate

Identifiers

PMID39570934
PMCPMC11581212

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.