ArticleBlood2025
Serum free light chains in a racially diverse population including African Americans and populations from South Africa.
Article in Blood, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03689595 (Predicting Progression of Developing Myeloma in a High-Risk Screened Population), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Predicting Progression of Developing Myeloma in a High-Risk Screened Population (PROMISE)
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Light Chain Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance: Diagnosis, Biology, and Clinical Management.European journal of haematology · 2026Review
- Global validation of revised sFLC cutoffs in amyloidosis.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Diagnosis, risk stratification and management of smouldering multiple myeloma.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Revised criteria for light chain MGUS enhance diagnostic accuracy and risk stratification.Blood cancer journal · 2026Article
- Reply: Refining Free Light Chain Ratio in Systemic Amyloidosis.JACC. CardioOncology · 2026Article
- Monoclonal Gammopathies in Africa.Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2025Review
- Screening for monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance is contraindicated.British journal of haematology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractDetection of light chain (LC) monoclonal gammopathies (MGs) traditionally relies on serum free LC (FLC) κ, λ, and their ratio (κ/λ) reference ranges based on a mostly White population. We investigated FLC values in a racially diverse population by screening 10 035 individuals for heavy chain MG, identifying 9028 negative cases whose FLC were measured. Participants included 4149 from the PROMISE study (United States, n = 2383; South Africa, n = 1766) and 4879 from the Mass General Brigham Biobank, with 44% self-identifying as Black. Using standard FLC reference ranges, 1074 of 10 035 individuals (10.7%) were diagnosed with LC monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), with 99% being κ-restricted. In the United States, 14.8% of Black and 4% of White individuals were diagnosed (P < .01). Among US participants of African (AFR) and European (EUR) genetic ancestry, 14.4% AFR and 2.9% EUR were diagnosed (P < .01). Among South Africans (100% Black), 27.8% were diagnosed using standard ranges. To avoid overdiagnosis, we propose a new κ/λ ratio reference range (0.686 to 2.10) for populations of AFR descent with normal renal function, with standard values for κ and λ being 7.97 to 77.50 mg/L and 6.20 to 49.20 mg/L, respectively. This reduces LC-MGUS overdiagnosis by 91% (10.7% vs 0.97%). Using the new reference, LC-MGUS accounts for 8.8% of MGUS cases, with 74% being κ-restricted, consistent with LC myeloma rates. These findings highlight the importance of basing disease definitions, such as MGUS, on diverse populations. Adopting our proposed FLC reference values would reduce MGUS overdiagnosis among Black individuals, avoiding unnecessary financial, psychological, and medical consequences. This study includes data from NCT03689595.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.