Observational studyVox sanguinis2025
Missed opportunities: Lack of a diagnostic workup of anaemia results in a high prevalence of unidentified anaemia.
Observational study in Vox sanguinis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- First-time red blood cell transfusions in the emergency department: A deficiency in micronutrient testing.Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Prevalence, Associated Factors, and Epidemiological Profile of Anemia Among Adults in a University Referral Hospital, Eastern Morocco.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Missed opportunities: Lack of a diagnostic workup of anaemia results in a high prevalence of unidentified anaemia.Vox sanguinis · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesAnaemia is a treatable common condition with various aetiologies and is prevalent in hospitalized patients. However, anaemia is inconsistently worked up and treated in the inpatient setting, in part because there is no standardized inpatient diagnostic and treatment approach to anaemia. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine the diagnostic approach and prevalence of common aetiologies of anaemia in hospitalized patients and test for an association between aetiologies of anaemia and patient characteristics. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study is a prospective observational study of hospitalized adult patients with anaemia. Patient laboratory data were used to assess the frequency of anaemia diagnostic workup and common aetiologies of anaemia.
resultsIn a sample of 945 patients (mean age 58 years, 57% female and 72% Black), 30% patients had chronic anaemia, 11% had multifactorial anaemia, 5% had iron deficiency and 37% had insufficient laboratory data to determine their anaemia aetiology (unidentified aetiology). Patients with an unidentified aetiology received fewer transfusions and were more likely to be White, have longer hospital stays and have higher nadir haemoglobin levels.
conclusionA significant portion of hospitalized patients with anaemia did not have an identified aetiology. A standardized diagnostic algorithm could decrease this number and help patients receive appropriate treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.