SynthesisBMC cancer2024
Genetic association between mitochondrial DNA copy number and glioma risk: insights from causality.
Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe genetic causal association between the mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNA-CN) and the development of glioma and glioblastoma (GBM) remains unclear.
methodsThe summary-level datasets for mtDNA-CN were obtained from participants in the UK Biobank and the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology consortium. Additionally, summary statistics datasets related to glioma were collected from a comprehensive meta-analysis genome-wide association study, which included 12,488 cases and 18,169 controls. The main method employed was inverse variance weighting, supplemented by Bonferroni correction to account for multiple tests. Additionally, sensitivity analyses were performed to address potential pleiotropy and strengthen the reliability of the results.
resultsIn the primary analysis, no genetic causal association was found between mtDNA-CN and glioma (OR = 1.20, 95%CI = 0.94-1.52, P = 0.1394), nor with low-grade glioma (OR = 1.09, 95%CI = 0.79-1.51, P = 0.5588). However, a suggestive genetic relationship between mtDNA-CN and glioblastoma was observed (OR = 1.42, 95%CI = 1.02-1.96, P = 0.0347). These findings were replicated in the MR analysis. Comprehensive analyses, including heterogeneity and pleiotropy analyses, as well as reverse analysis, confirmed the robustness of these results.
conclusionOur MR study did not find a genetic causal association between mtDNA-CN and the risk of glioma. A suggestive causal association between GBM and mtDNA-CN was detected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.