ReviewCureus2024
Comparative Effectiveness of Endoscopic Versus Pharmacological Interventions for Variceal Rebleeding in Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-07-16Concerns/Issues about Authorship/Affiliation · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Paper Mill · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Variceal bleeding is a critical complication in cirrhotic patients, significantly increasing morbidity and mortality risks, particularly after an initial bleeding episode. This systematic review evaluates and compares the effectiveness of endoscopic and pharmacological interventions in preventing variceal rebleeding. A comprehensive search of major databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science, was conducted to identify studies published within the past decade. The review focused on randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and meta-analyses that assessed the efficacy and safety of these treatments in adult cirrhotic patients with a history of variceal bleeding. The findings suggest that endoscopic interventions, such as band ligation and early transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement, effectively reduce immediate rebleeding rates and improve short-term survival, particularly in high-risk patients with advanced cirrhosis. In contrast, pharmacological strategies, including beta-blockers and vasoactive agents, provide effective long-term management with fewer adverse events, especially in patients with milder liver disease. The review underscores the importance of a personalized treatment approach that integrates both endoscopic and pharmacological therapies to optimize outcomes and reduce the burden of rebleeding. It also highlights the need for further high-quality research to clarify the long-term benefits, impact on quality of life, and cost-effectiveness of these interventions. These insights form the basis for refining clinical guidelines and improving patient-centered care in the management of variceal rebleeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.