ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024
Utilizing machine learning techniques to identify severe sleep disturbances in Chinese adolescents: an analysis of lifestyle, physical activity, and psychological factors.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adolescents often experience difficulties with sleep quality. The existing literature on predicting severe sleep disturbance is limited, primarily due to the absence of reliable tools. Methods: This study analyzed 1966 university students. All participants were classified into a training set and a validation set at the ratio of 8:2 at random. Participants in the training set were utilized to establish models, and the logistic regression (LR) and five machine learning algorithms, including the eXtreme Gradient Boosting Machine (XGBM), Naïve Bayesian (NB), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), CatBoosting Machine (CatBM), were utilized to develop models. Whereas, those in the validation set were used to validate the developed models. Results: The incidence of severe sleep disturbance was 5.28% (104/1969). Among all developed models, the XGBM model performed best in AUC (0.872 [95%CI: 0.848-0.896]), followed by the CatBM model (0.853 [95% CI: 0.821-0.878]) and DT model (0.843 [95% CI: 0.801-0.870]), whereas the AUC of the logistic regression model was only 0.822 (95% CI: 0.777-0.856). Additionally, the XGBM model had the best accuracy (0.792), precision (0.780), F1 score (0.796), Brier score (0.143), and log loss (0.444). Conclusions: The XGBM model may be a useful tool to estimate the risk of experiencing severe sleep disturbance among adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.