ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2024
Immunogenicity and safety of tixagevimab-cilgavimab for COVID-19 pre-exposure prophylaxis in immunocompromised 20 to <40 kg children and adolescents: A pilot, prospective, open-labeled study.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We evaluated the immunogenicity of 300 mg Tixagevimab-Cilgavimab in immunocompromised children and adolescents who weighed 20 to >40 kg. Six to 18-year-old participants were divided into two groups by body weight and received 300 mg (20 to <40 kg) and 600 mg (≥40 kg) Tixagevimab-Cilgavimab, respectively. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain IgG concentrations and pseudovirus neutralizing antibody (NAb) titers were measured at 4, 12, and 24 weeks after administration and compared with reference data from healthy Thai children at 2 weeks after three BNT162b2 vaccinations. Of 59 participants, 49.2% were female, with a median (IQR) age of 12 (9, 15) years; 16 (27.1%) had cancer. NAb titers (95% CI) for the ancestral Wuhan strain were comparatively high for both dosing regimens (16363.2 [13765.9, 19450.5] vs 17768.3 [15539.5, 20316.9] in 20 to <40 kg and ≥40 kg participants, respectively) and significantly higher than reference titers (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.