Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39576290›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2024

Utilizing a domain-specific large language model for LI-RADS v2018 categorization of free-text MRI reports: a feasibility study.

Mario Matute-González, Anna Darnell, Marc Comas-Cufí, Javier Pazó, Alexandre Soler, Belén Saborido, Ezequiel Mauro, Juan Turnes, Alejandro Forner, María Reig and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Current State of Evidence for Use of MRI in LI-RADS.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mario Matute-GonzálezBCLC Group, Radiology Department, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
Anna DarnellBCLC Group, Radiology Department, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
Marc Comas-CufíComputer Science, Applied Mathematics and Statistics Department, University of Girona, Girona, Spain.
Javier PazóInformation Technology Department, Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver, Madrid, Spain.
Alexandre SolerBCLC Group, Radiology Department, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
Belén SaboridoBCLC Group, Fundació Clínic per la Recerca Biomèdica-IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
Ezequiel MauroBCLC Group, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Fundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomédica (FCRB), IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Juan TurnesGastroenterology and Hepatology, Pontevedra University Hospital Complex, Pontevedra, Spain.
Alejandro FornerBCLC Group, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Fundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomédica (FCRB), IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
María ReigBCLC Group, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Fundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomédica (FCRB), IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jordi RimolaBCLC Group, Radiology Department, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain. jrimola@clinic.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1814-4198

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a domain-specific large language model (LLM) for LI-RADS v2018 categorization of hepatic observations based on free-text descriptions extracted from MRI reports. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis retrospective study included 291 small liver observations, divided into training (n = 141), validation (n = 30), and test (n = 120) datasets. Of these, 120 were fictitious, and 171 were extracted from 175 MRI reports from a single institution. The algorithm's performance was compared to two independent radiologists and one hepatologist in a human replacement scenario, and considering two combined strategies (double reading with arbitration and triage). Agreement on LI-RADS category and dichotomic malignancy (LR-4, LR-5, and LR-M) were estimated using linear-weighted κ statistics and Cohen's κ, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for LR-5 were calculated. The consensus agreement of three other radiologists served as the ground truth.

resultsThe model showed moderate agreement against the ground truth for both LI-RADS categorization (κ = 0.54 [95% CI: 0.42-0.65]) and the dichotomized approach (κ = 0.58 [95% CI: 0.42-0.73]). Sensitivity and specificity for LR-5 were 0.76 (95% CI: 0.69-0.86) and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.91-1.00), respectively. When the chatbot was used as a triage tool, performance improved for LI-RADS categorization (κ = 0.86/0.87 for the two independent radiologists and κ = 0.76 for the hepatologist), dichotomized malignancy (κ = 0.94/0.91 and κ = 0.87) and LR-5 identification (1.00/0.98 and 0.85 sensitivity, 0.96/0.92 and 0.92 specificity), with no statistical significance compared to the human readers' individual performance. Through this strategy, the workload decreased by 45%.

conclusionLI-RADS v2018 categorization from unlabelled MRI reports is feasible using our LLM, and it enhances the efficiency of data curation. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Our proof-of-concept study provides novel insights into the potential applications of LLMs, offering a real-world example of how these tools could be integrated into a local workflow to optimize data curation for research purposes. KEY POINTS: Automatic LI-RADS categorization from free-text reports would be beneficial to workflow and data mining. LiverAI, a GPT-4-based model, supported various strategies improving data curation efficiency by up to 60%. LLMs can integrate into workflows, significantly reducing radiologists' workload.

Indexed as

Hepatocellular carcinomaNatural language processingRadiologyReportStandardization

Identifiers

PMID39576290
PMCPMC11584817

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.