ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2025
Prolonged remission after cyclophosphamide or tacrolimus treatment in childhood nephrotic syndrome: a cohort study.
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immune dysregulation in pediatric cancer-associated nephrotic syndrome: current insights.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
- Tacrolimus-induced reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome in a child with nephrotic syndrome: a case report.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Response predictors and long-term outcomes of preprandial single-daily cyclosporine in children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome.Journal of nephrology · 2025Article
- Challenging Clinical Practice Guideline Definitions in Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2025Article
- Practice variation in the use of steroid-sparing therapies in childhood steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome: results from a prospective cohort study.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSteroid-sparing immunosuppression is used in 50% of children with nephrotic syndrome, to prevent relapses and steroid-related toxicity. However, rates and predictors of prolonged remission after cyclophosphamide and tacrolimus are uncertain.
methodsRetrospective analysis of children (1-18 years) enrolled in a longitudinal cohort. We included children diagnosed with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome between 1996-2019 from Toronto, Canada. The exposure was cyclophosphamide or tacrolimus initiation. The primary outcome was prolonged remission (no further relapse or steroid-sparing immunosuppression). We evaluated predictors of prolonged remission and calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity by logistic regression.
resultsOf 578 children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome, 252 received cyclophosphamide and 120 received tacrolimus. Over median 5.4-year (IQR 2.4-9.1) follow-up, prolonged remission occurred in 72 (28.6%) after cyclophosphamide and 17 (14.2%) after tacrolimus. Relapse frequency decreased after initiation of either medication. Lower prior relapse rate, more recent treatment era, and female sex were predictive of prolonged remission after cyclophosphamide treatment. Use of tacrolimus as the first steroid-sparing medication was the only factor predictive of calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity.
conclusionsLess than one-third of children achieve prolonged remission after initiating cyclophosphamide or tacrolimus, although both reduce short-term relapse rates. Few factors predict prolonged remission after cyclophosphamide or tacrolimus use, or calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39576325What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.