ArticleBMJ open2024
Evaluating the effectiveness of the National Health Insurance Subsidy Programme within Kenya's universal health coverage initiative: a study protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Who remains uncovered? Assessing inequalities and determinants of national health insurance enrolment among informal sector workers in Kenya.Global health research and policy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLow-income and middle-income countries, including Kenya, are pursuing universal health coverage (UHC) through the establishment of Social Health Insurance programmes. As Kenya rolls out the recently unveiled UHC strategy that includes a national indigent cover programme, the goal of this study is to evaluate the impact of health insurance subsidy on poor households' healthcare costs and utilisation. We will also assess the effectiveness and equity in the beneficiary identification approach employed. METHODOLOGY AND ANALYSIS: Using a quantitative design with quasi-experimental and cross-sectional methods, our matched cohort study will recruit 1350 households across three purposively selected counties. The 'exposure' arm, enrolled in the UHC indigent programme, will be compared with a control arm of eligible but unenrolled households over 12 months. Coarsened exact matching will be used to pair households based on baseline characteristics, analysing differences in expenses and catastrophic health expenditure. A cross-sectional design will be employed to evaluate the effectiveness and equity in beneficiary identification, estimating inclusion errors associated with the subsidy programme while assessing gender equity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the Scientific and Ethics Review Unit at Kenya Medical Research Institute, with additional permissions sought from County Health Departments. Participants will provide written informed consent. Dissemination strategies include peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and policy-maker engagement for broad accessibility and impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.