Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39578301›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2025

Patient-derived glioma organoids real time identification of IDH mutation, 1p/19q-codeletion and CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion with differential ion mobility spectrometry.

Ismaïl Hermelo, Ilkka Haapala, Meri Mäkelä, Dafne Jacome Sanz, Anton Kontunen, Markus Karjalainen, Philipp Müller, Kai Lehtimäki, Matti Nykter, Juhana Frösén and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Ismaïl HermeloProstate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland. ismail.hermelo@gmail.com.
Ilkka HaapalaDepartment of Neurosurgery and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere University Hospital and Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Meri MäkeläFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Dafne Jacome SanzDepartment of Neurosurgery and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere University Hospital and Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Anton KontunenFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Markus KarjalainenFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Philipp MüllerFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Kai LehtimäkiDepartment of Neurosurgery and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere University Hospital and Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Matti NykterProstate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Juhana FrösénDepartment of Neurosurgery and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere University Hospital and Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Hannu HaapasaloFimlab Laboratories Ltd., Tampere, Finland.
Antti RoineFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Niku OksalaFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Kristiina NordforsDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Antti VehkaojaFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Joonas HaapasaloDepartment of Neurosurgery and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere University Hospital and Tampere University, Tampere, Finland. joonas.haapasalo@pirha.fi.

Funding

Research Council of Finland 360768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeExtent of brain tumor resection continues to be one of the central decisions taken during standard of care in glioma patients. Here, we aimed to evaluate the most essential molecular factors, such as IDH (isocitrate dehydrogenase) mutation in gliomas classification with patient-derived glioma organoids (PGOs) using differential mobility spectrometry (DMS).

methodswe prospectively recruited 12 glioma patients, 6 IDH-mutated and 6 IDH wild-type tumors, from which PGOs were generated ex-vivo. Altogether, 320 PGOs DMS spectra were analyzed with a classifier algorithm based on linear discriminant analysis (LDA).

resultsLDA model classification accuracy (CA) obtained between IDH-mutant and IDH wild-type PGOs was 90% (91% sensitivity and 89% specificity). Furthermore, 1p/19q codeletion classification within IDH mutant PGOs reached 98% CA (93% sensitivity and 99% specificity), while CDKN2A/B homozygous loss status had 86% CA (63% sensitivity 93% specificity).

conclusionDMS suitability to differentiate IDH-mutated PGOs was thus validated in ex vivo cultured samples, PGOs. Preliminary results regarding 1p/19q codeleted PGOs and CDKN2A/B loss PGOs identification endorse testing in a prospective intraoperative glioma patient cohort. Our results reveal a sample classification set-up that is compatible with real-time intraoperative surgery guidance.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p15Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16GliomaIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMutationOrganoidsAdultAgedChromosome DeletionChromosomes, Human, Pair 1Chromosomes, Human, Pair 19FemaleHomozygoteHumansMaleCDKN2A protein, humanCDKN2B protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p15Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Isocitrate Dehydrogenase1p/19 co-deletionCDKN2A/B homozygous lossDifferential mobility spectrometryIDH mutationLinear discriminant analysisPatient-derived glioma organoids

Identifiers

PMID39578301
PMCPMC11729090

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.