Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39578546›Full record

ReviewEye (London, England)2025

Gene therapy for geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration: current insights.

Muhammad Usman Jamil, Nadia K Waheed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Development of a conceptual, HOV-inspired spatial weighting model for quantifying geographic atrophy severity.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Muhammad Usman JamilNew England Eye Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02116, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9642-1886
Nadia K WaheedNew England Eye Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02116, USA. nadiakwaheed@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8229-7519

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Geographic atrophy (GA) is the advanced stage of non-neovascular (dry) age-related macular degeneration, defined by the presence of sharply demarcated atrophic lesions of the outer retina. The complement system is integral to the body's natural immune response, and hence its overactivation can lead to tissue damage and inflammation. It has been shown to play a significant role in GA lesion development and progression, and therefore, complement inhibition is emerging as a promising avenue for therapeutic intervention. With the recent approval by the Food and Drug Administration of drugs like SYFOVRE™ (pegcetacoplan injection) and IZERVAY™ (avacincaptad pegol intravitreal solution), there is hope for the development of interventions capable of slowing down or arresting the progression of GA. In particular, gene therapy intervention is gaining traction for halting GA atrophy at the source of our genes. The concept is to insert a gene into the eye that will act as an ocular "bio-factory," producing a desired protein. This can either lead to overproduction of an already available protein or produce a substance not typically generated in the eye. This review aims to provide an overview of the present understanding of GA, encompassing risk factors, prevalence, pathophysiology, and genetic associations. It will also highlight the current landscape of GA treatment, with particular emphasis on gene therapy intervention.

Indexed as

Genetic TherapyGeographic AtrophyMacular DegenerationHumans

Identifiers

PMID39578546
PMCPMC11751089

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.