ReviewEye (London, England)2025
Photoreceptor assessment in age-related macular degeneration.
Review in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Subretinal Drusenoid Deposits on Ellipsoid Zone-Related Thickness Metrics.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Comparison of Measurement Techniques for Photoreceptor Loss in Geographic Atrophy.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Tracking of Photoreceptor Integrity in Neovascular AMD: Early Restoration Predicts 24-Month Structural and Visual Outcomes.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Clinical and Molecular Characteristics of Foveal Sparing Phenotype in Chinese Patients With Inherited Retinal Diseases.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Comparison of axial length measurements with RS-1 spectral domain optical coherence tomography and OA-2000 biometer.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Investigating Macular Tissue Integrity Index as a Novel Biomarker in Geographic Atrophy.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical trials investigating drugs for various stages of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) are actively underway and there is a strong interest in outcomes that demonstrate a structure-function-correlation. The ellipsoid zone (EZ), a crucial anatomical feature affected in this disease, has emerged as a strong contender. There is significant interest in evaluating EZ metrics on Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), such as integrity and reflectivity, as disruption of this photoreceptor-rich layer may indicate disease progression. Loss of photoreceptor integrity in the junctional zone of geographic atrophy (GA) has been shown to exceed the areas of retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) atrophy, thus predicting future GA expansion. Furthermore, reduced visual acuity and retinal sensitivity have been correlated with loss of EZ integrity, underscoring a structure-function relationship. Photoreceptor integrity has also recently been acknowledged by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), supporting its use as a primary endpoint in clinical trials investigating treatments for GA. However, the segmentation of this EZ still poses challenges. Continuous enhancements in OCT resolution and advancements in automated segmentation algorithms contribute to improved assessment of the EZ, strengthening its potential as an imaging biomarker for assessing photoreceptor function. It remains to be seen whether the EZ will serve as a surrogate marker for intermediate AMD. This article aims to provide an overview of the current understanding and knowledge of the EZ, while addressing ongoing challenges encountered in its assessment and interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.