ArticleScientific reports2024
Integrating gene expression analysis and ecophysiological responses to water deficit in leaves of tomato plants.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative Transcriptomic and Evolutionary Analysis of Drought and Heat Stress Responses inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Organ-level gene-regulatory networks inferred from transcriptomic data reveal context-specific regulation and highlight novel regulators of ripening and ABA-mediated responses in tomato.Plant communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soil water deficit (WD) significantly impacts plant survival and crop yields. Many gaps remain in our understanding of the synergistic coordination between molecular and ecophysiological responses delaying substantial drought-induced effects on plant growth. To investigate this synergism in tomato leaves, we combined molecular, ecophysiological, and anatomical methods to examine gene expression patterns and physio-anatomical characteristics during a progressing WD experiment. Four sampling points were selected for transcriptomic analysis based on the key ecophysiological responses of the tomato leaves: 4 and 5 days after WD (d-WD), corresponding to 10% and 90% decrease in leaf stomatal conductance; 8 d-WD, the leaf wilting point; and 10 d-WD, when air embolism blocks 12% of the leaf xylem water transport. At 4 d-WD, upregulated genes were mostly linked to ABA-independent responses, with larger-scale ABA-dependent responses occurring at 5 d-WD. At 8 d-WD, we observed an upregulation of heat shock transcription factors, and two days later (10 d-WD), we found a strong upregulation of oxidative stress transcription factors. Finally, we found that young leaves present a stronger dehydration tolerance than mature leaves at the same drought intensity level, presumably because young leaves upregulate genes related to increased callose deposition resulting in limiting water loss to the phloem, and related to increased cell rigidity by modifying cell wall structures. This combined dataset will serve as a framework for future studies that aim to obtain a more holistic WD plant response at the molecular, ecophysiological and anatomical level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.