ArticleIET systems biology2024
Human essential gene identification based on feature fusion and feature screening.
Article in IET systems biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- ac4C modification sites prediction in human mRNA: a complete review.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Human essential gene identification based on feature fusion and feature screening.IET systems biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Essential genes are necessary to sustain the life of a species under adequate nutritional conditions. These genes have attracted significant attention for their potential as drug targets, especially in developing broad-spectrum antibacterial drugs. However, studying essential genes remains challenging due to their variability in specific environmental conditions. In this study, the authors aim to develop a powerful prediction model for identifying essential genes in humans. The authors first obtained the essential gene data from human cancer cell lines and characterised gene sequences using 7 feature encoding methods such as Kmer, the Composition of K-spaced Nucleic Acid Pairs, and Z-curve. Subsequently, feature fusion and feature optimisation strategies were employed to select the impactful features. Finally, machine learning algorithms were applied to construct the prediction models and evaluate their performance. The single-feature-based model achieved the highest area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.830. After fusing and filtering these features, the classical machine learning models achieved the highest AUC at 0.823 while the deep learning model reached 0.860. Results obtained by the authors show that compared to using individual features, feature fusion and feature optimisation strategies significantly improved model performance. Moreover, the study provided an advantageous method for essential gene identification compared to other methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.