ArticleAnimal microbiome2024
Resistomes from oxytetracycline-treated pigs are readily transferred to untreated pen mates.
Article in Animal microbiome, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Evaluation of qPCR for QuantifyingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From mother to piglet: the lasting influence of the maternal microbiome.Animal microbiome · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pork is currently a major part of Danish food export and is also a key dietary source of protein across the world. Industrial pork production, however, comes with high antibiotic usage in many countries, including Denmark. This has created consumer demand for meat Raised Without Antibiotics (RWA). Previous work has demonstrated that levels of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) are indeed increased in antibiotically treated animals, but also suggest that these ARGs are transferred to untreated pen-mates. In a Danish commercial farm, we studied four groups of physically separated pigs: one group of only antibiotic treated pigs (n = 20), one group of only untreated pigs (n = 30 total, n = 15 analysed), and one group combining treated (n = 15) and untreated pigs (n = 15). These groups were followed for 16 weeks during which all pigs were profiled for both their faecal microbiome (through 16 S rRNA gene sequencing) and resistome (by use of a high-throughput qPCR platform targeting 82 ARGs and their variants). We found that the resistome of treated pigs was substantially enriched in resistance genes compared to untreated pigs but, importantly, observed that untreated pigs co-reared with treated pigs had levels of resistance genes approaching their treated pen mates, suggesting that the treated enterotype is readily transferred to the untreated animal. From this, we conclude that mixing of treated and untreated pigs causes spill-over of antibiotic resistant bacteria and/or resistance genes from treated pigs when these are co-reared. To optimize RWA production, treated and untreated pigs should be physically separated to limit the proliferation of ARGs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.