ArticleDiscover oncology2024
Transcriptomic, mutational and structural bioinformatics approaches to explore the therapeutic role of FAP in predominant cancer types.
Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comprehensive in silico investigation into the deleterious nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms of the human transcription factor EB (TFEB) gene and their predicted association with cancer.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Multimodal artificial intelligence and machine learning in oncology: from data integration to precision cancer care.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fibroblast activating protein (FAP) is a cell surface marker of cancer-associated fibroblasts with a distinct pro-tumorigenic role. The present study analyzed the pan-cancer expression; and clinical and mutational profiles of the FAP coding gene. Molecular dynamics simulation (MDS) deciphered the backbone dynamics and energetics of FAP. Virtual screening and subsequent pharmacokinetic-profiling (PK) filtered lead molecules, which were subjected to molecular docking. MDS projected a stable trajectory for the protein, as dynamics evidenced by low residue-level fluctuations, stable backbone dynamics, and energetics. Around five stabilization and deleterious mutations in the catalytic domain were identified. The low binding energy (BE) profiles from molecular docking studies screened the top five lead molecules for site-specific intermolecular interaction studies. Lead-16 (ZINC000245289699) exhibited a significant BE and inhibition constant of -6.87 kcal/mol and 12.27 μM, respectively, across FAP and its mutants. Interestingly, the docked complexes of Lead-16 interacted with the catalytic triad residues (S624, D702, and H734). The docked complexes of Lead-16 with FAP showed lower average root-mean-square fluctuations compared to the unbound protein, suggesting a stable ligand-protein complex. The tumor-specific expression and its critical overall survival suggest the inhibitors of FAP for potential cancer therapeutic intervention and hindering tumor microenvironment-driven cancer progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.