Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39581517›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of cardiology2025

A Multicenter Evaluation of the Impact of Therapies on Deep Learning-Based Electrocardiographic Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Markers.

Lovedeep S Dhingra, Veer Sangha, Arya Aminorroaya, Robyn Bryde, Andrew Gaballa, Adel H Ali, Nandini Mehra, Harlan M Krumholz, Sounok Sen, Christopher M Kramer and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Mitochondrial tRNAHuman mutation · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Reliability of Artificial Intelligence-enhanced Electrocardiography.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Lovedeep S DhingraSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Veer SanghaSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Engineering Science, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Arya AminorroayaSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Robyn BrydeDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Atlantic Health, Morristown Medical Center, Morristown, New Jersey; Sports Cardiology and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, Morristown Medical Center, Morristown, New Jersey.
Andrew GaballaHeart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Adel H AliHeart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Nandini MehraHeart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Harlan M KrumholzSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.
Sounok SenSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Christopher M KramerCardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Matthew W MartinezDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Atlantic Health, Morristown Medical Center, Morristown, New Jersey; Sports Cardiology and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, Morristown Medical Center, Morristown, New Jersey.
Milind Y DesaiHeart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Evangelos K OikonomouSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Rohan KheraSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut; Section of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Section of Health Informatics, Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: rohan.khera@yale.edu.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Deep learning enhanced detection and personalized monitoring of aortic stenosis - The DETECT-AS StudyR01AG089981 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Rohan Khera · 2024 to 2026
$2.4M
Translating Personalized Inference from Randomized Clinical Trials to Real-World Cardiovascular CareR01HL167858 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Rohan Khera · 2024 to 2026
$2.3M
Evaluating and Improving Utilization of Evidence-Based Medical Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure using Automated Tools in the Electronic Health RecordK23HL153775 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KHERA, ROHAN · 2021 to 2025
$918k
A multi-modal approach for efficient, point-of-care screening of hypertrophic cardiomyopathyF32HL170592 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI OIKONOMOU, EVANGELOS · 2023 to 2024
$166k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL170592NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL153775NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL167858NIA NIH HHS R01 AG089981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography (AI-ECG) can identify hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) on 12-lead ECGs and offers a novel way to monitor treatment response. Although the surgical or percutaneous reduction of the interventricular septum (SRT) represented initial HCM therapies, mavacamten offers an oral alternative. We aimed to assess the use of AI-ECG as a strategy to evaluate biologic responses to SRT and mavacamten. We applied an AI-ECG model for HCM detection to electrocardiography images from patients who underwent SRT across 3 sites: Yale New Haven Health System (YNHHS), Cleveland Clinic Foundation (CCF), and Atlantic Health System (AHS) and to electrocardiography images from patients receiving mavacamten at YNHHS. A total of 70 patients underwent SRT at YNHHS, 100 at CCF, and 145 at AHS. At YNHHS, there was no significant change in the AI-ECG HCM score before versus after SRT (before SRT: median 0.55 [interquartile range 0.24 to 0.77] vs after SRT: 0.59 [0.40 to 0.75]). The AI-ECG HCM scores also did not improve after SRT at CCF (0.61 [0.32 to 0.79] vs 0.69 [0.52 to 0.79]) and AHS (0.52 [0.35 to 0.69] vs 0.61 [0.49 to 0.70]). Of the 36 YNHHS patients on mavacamten therapy, the median AI-ECG score before starting mavacamten was 0.41 (0.22 to 0.77), which decreased significantly to 0.28 (0.11 to 0.50, p <0.001 by Wilcoxon signed-rank test) at the end of a median follow-up period of 237 days. In conclusion, we observed a lack of improvement in AI-based HCM score with SRT, in contrast to a significant decrease with mavacamten. Our approach suggests the potential role of AI-ECG for serial point-of-care monitoring of pathophysiologic improvement after medical therapy in HCM using ECG images.

Indexed as

Cardiomyopathy, HypertrophicDeep LearningElectrocardiographyAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedartificial intelligenceelectrocardiogramhypertrophic cardiomyopathymavacamtenseptal reduction therapy

Identifiers

PMID39581517
PMCPMC11761372

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.