ArticleThe American journal of cardiology2025
A Multicenter Evaluation of the Impact of Therapies on Deep Learning-Based Electrocardiographic Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Markers.
Article in The American journal of cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disease-focused evaluation of AI-ECG tools: clarifying study design, findings, and the principles of open science.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- The Evolving Utility of Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools for the Detection of Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathies: From Potential to Implementation.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
- Open science requires trust and rigour: a framework for responsible evaluation of shared AI-ECG tools.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-enhanced Electrocardiography for Heart Failure Screening and Risk Stratification.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
- Mitochondrial tRNAHuman mutation · 2026Article
- Complete left bundle branch block resolution during treatment with Mavacamten: a case report of a first-in-class scenario.European heart journal. Case reports · 2025Article
- Reliability of Artificial Intelligence-enhanced Electrocardiography.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography and sudden death risk factors in cardiac arrest survivors diagnosed with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Article
- ECG markers of left ventricular hypertrophy indicate response to mavacamten in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.Open heart · 2025Article
- Identification of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy on electrocardiographic images with deep learning.Nature cardiovascular research · 2025Article
- The emerging role of AI in transforming cardiovascular care.Future cardiology · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Prediction of Heart Failure Risk From Single-Lead Electrocardiograms.JAMA cardiology · 2025Article
- Identification of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy on Electrocardiographic Images with Deep Learning.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Ensemble Deep Learning Algorithm for Structural Heart Disease Screening Using Electrocardiographic Images: PRESENT SHD.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Heart failure risk stratification using artificial intelligence applied to electrocardiogram images: a multinational study.European heart journal · 2025Article
- Leveraging AI-enhanced digital health with consumer devices for scalable cardiovascular screening, prediction, and monitoring.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2025Review
- Scalable Risk Stratification for Heart Failure Using Artificial Intelligence applied to 12-lead Electrocardiographic Images: A Multinational Study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography (AI-ECG) can identify hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) on 12-lead ECGs and offers a novel way to monitor treatment response. Although the surgical or percutaneous reduction of the interventricular septum (SRT) represented initial HCM therapies, mavacamten offers an oral alternative. We aimed to assess the use of AI-ECG as a strategy to evaluate biologic responses to SRT and mavacamten. We applied an AI-ECG model for HCM detection to electrocardiography images from patients who underwent SRT across 3 sites: Yale New Haven Health System (YNHHS), Cleveland Clinic Foundation (CCF), and Atlantic Health System (AHS) and to electrocardiography images from patients receiving mavacamten at YNHHS. A total of 70 patients underwent SRT at YNHHS, 100 at CCF, and 145 at AHS. At YNHHS, there was no significant change in the AI-ECG HCM score before versus after SRT (before SRT: median 0.55 [interquartile range 0.24 to 0.77] vs after SRT: 0.59 [0.40 to 0.75]). The AI-ECG HCM scores also did not improve after SRT at CCF (0.61 [0.32 to 0.79] vs 0.69 [0.52 to 0.79]) and AHS (0.52 [0.35 to 0.69] vs 0.61 [0.49 to 0.70]). Of the 36 YNHHS patients on mavacamten therapy, the median AI-ECG score before starting mavacamten was 0.41 (0.22 to 0.77), which decreased significantly to 0.28 (0.11 to 0.50, p <0.001 by Wilcoxon signed-rank test) at the end of a median follow-up period of 237 days. In conclusion, we observed a lack of improvement in AI-based HCM score with SRT, in contrast to a significant decrease with mavacamten. Our approach suggests the potential role of AI-ECG for serial point-of-care monitoring of pathophysiologic improvement after medical therapy in HCM using ECG images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.