Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39581949›Full record

ReviewCNS drugs2025

Measuring Disease Progression in Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Drug Trials and Impact on Future Patient Care.

Floriana De Angelis, Riccardo Nistri, Sarah Wright

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in CNS drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Floriana De AngelisDepartment of Neuroinflammation, Faculty of Brain Sciences, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, WC1B 5EH, UK. f.deangelis@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9833-1435
Riccardo NistriDepartment of Neuroinflammation, Faculty of Brain Sciences, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, WC1B 5EH, UK.
Sarah WrightDepartment of Neuroinflammation, Faculty of Brain Sciences, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, WC1B 5EH, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic immune-mediated disease of the central nervous system characterised by inflammation, demyelination and neurodegeneration. Although several drugs are approved for MS, their efficacy in progressive disease is modest. Addressing disease progression as a treatment goal in MS is challenging due to several factors. These include a lack of complete understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms driving MS and the absence of sensitive markers of disease progression in the short-term of clinical trials. MS usually begins at a young age and lasts for decades, whereas clinical research often spans only 1-3 years. Additionally, there is no unifying definition of disease progression. Several drugs are currently being investigated for progressive MS. In addition to new medications, the rise of new technologies and of adaptive trial designs is enabling larger and more integrated data collection. Remote assessments and decentralised clinical trials are becoming feasible. These will allow more efficient and large studies at a lower cost and with less burden on study participants. As new drugs are developed and research evolves, we anticipate a concurrent change in patient care at various levels in the foreseeable future. We conducted a narrative review to discuss the challenges of accurately measuring disease progression in contemporary MS drug trials, some new research trends and their implications for patient care.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicDisease ProgressionMultiple SclerosisDrug DevelopmentHumansPatient CareResearch Design

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.