ArticleScientific reports2024
A convergent mixed methods to study registration on kidney transplantation waiting list refusal by women and men on dialysis in France.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nephrologists' perception of the French national guidelines in nephrology.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Not all patients on dialysis want to be registered on the kidney transplantation (KT) waiting list and undergo transplantation. The aim of this convergent mixed methods study was to determine the features of patients refusing to be registered on the KT waiting list and the reasons. Quantitative data on all 2017-2019 incident 18-85-year-old dialysis patients, eligible for KT, were extracted from the REIN registry in France. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews with patients on dialysis and nephrologists from the Bretagne, Île-de-France and Normandie French regions. The binary logistic regression method was used to identify factors/reasons associated with registration refusal and an inductive thematic analysis was performed on qualitative data. The quantitative analysis included data of 10,512 patients (mean age = 57.5 years). Among them, 860 (8.18%) refused to be registered on the KT waiting list. The multivariate analysis showed that women were 83% more likely to refuse registration compared with men. The qualitative analysis included 21 patients and 11 nephrologists. The integration of the results from the quantitative and qualitative analyses allowed identifying some factors associated with the registration refusal. Most of these factors converged across analyses. These included age, sex/gender, autonomy on dialysis and comorbidities. The integration of the results highlighted some divergence concerning sex/gender and autonomy and an area of expansion related to comorbidities. In conclusion, the patient age, sex/gender and comorbidities appear to play an important role in the refusal to be registered on the waiting list. Interventions focused on these factors might help to improve KT accessibility in France.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.