ArticleScientific reports2024
Hemodynamic evaluation of endovascular techniques of stenting and coiling for the treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysm: a computational study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The selection optimum endovascular method for the treatment of different cerebral aneurysms has been the main challenge for surgeons. In the present article, the computational technique is used for the hemodynamic evaluation of two main endovascular techniques of stent and coiling for the reduction of the hemorrhage risk of ICA aneurysms. Comprehensive analyses of the blood flow are performed to detect potential regions with high risk at critical stages of the cardiac cycle. Two coiling porosity conditions and stent deformation have been investigated via computational study to reveal the main change related to hemodynamics when these techniques are implemented. The hemodynamic results of this study show that the endovascular technique is more efficient in small aneurysms rather than giant ones. Meanwhile, the stent treatment of the giant saccular aneurysm is effective when the parent vessel of this type of aneurysm is fully aligned and limited blood flow enters the sac area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.