Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39582080›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Hemodynamic evaluation of endovascular techniques of stenting and coiling for the treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysm: a computational study.

Jian Pei, Xiang Xu, Li-Cai Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jian PeiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tangshan Gongren Hospital, Tangshan, 063000, HeBei, China.
Xiang XuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tangshan Gongren Hospital, Tangshan, 063000, HeBei, China. 13230581021@163.com.
Li-Cai ZhaoThe Third Engineering Co., Ltd., China Railway 19th Bureau Group Co., Ltd, Shenyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The selection optimum endovascular method for the treatment of different cerebral aneurysms has been the main challenge for surgeons. In the present article, the computational technique is used for the hemodynamic evaluation of two main endovascular techniques of stent and coiling for the reduction of the hemorrhage risk of ICA aneurysms. Comprehensive analyses of the blood flow are performed to detect potential regions with high risk at critical stages of the cardiac cycle. Two coiling porosity conditions and stent deformation have been investigated via computational study to reveal the main change related to hemodynamics when these techniques are implemented. The hemodynamic results of this study show that the endovascular technique is more efficient in small aneurysms rather than giant ones. Meanwhile, the stent treatment of the giant saccular aneurysm is effective when the parent vessel of this type of aneurysm is fully aligned and limited blood flow enters the sac area.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresHemodynamicsIntracranial AneurysmStentsCarotid Artery DiseasesCarotid Artery, InternalComputer SimulationHumansCerebrovascular aneurysmsComputational techniqueNon-newtonian flowStent

Identifiers

PMID39582080
PMCPMC11586413

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.