ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2024
Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Venous Thromboembolism: A Comparative Study of 55 Patients.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with venous thrombosis and inherited thrombophilia.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inherited deficiencies in antithrombin (AT), protein C (PC), and protein S (PS) increase the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in severe VTE cases after mechanical thrombectomy are uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the use of DOACs combined with mechanical thrombectomy in 55 patients with VTE, including 11 patients with confirmed deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary thromboembolism (PE), 27 patients with DVT alone, and 17 with pulmonary thromboembolism alone, from a single center between January 2016 and December 2023. MATERIAL AND METHODS All patients with symptomatic VTE confirmed by computed tomography underwent mechanical thrombectomy. Fourteen patients with reduced AT (n=4), PC (n=6), and PS (n=4) function were classified as group 1, while the remaining 41 without thrombophilia were classified as group 2. The outcomes, including recurrent VTE, bleeding events, and all-cause mortality, were compared between patients with and without thrombophilia. RESULTS DOAC use was similar between the groups. One patient in the thrombophilia group switched DOACs due to bleeding, while 7 in the non-thrombophilia group changed due to bleeding or recurrent VTE. Recurrent VTE was higher in the non-thrombophilia group (7.1% vs 17.1%; P=0.664), while bleeding events were more frequent in the thrombophilia group (35.7% vs 17.1%; P=0.259); however, neither difference was statistically significant. All-cause mortality was similar between groups (7.1% vs 6.7%; P=0.903). CONCLUSIONS The study found no difference in the efficacy and safety of DOACs between VTE patients with and without inherited thrombophilia undergoing mechanical thrombectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.