SynthesisEuropean journal of neurology2025
Inequities in neurological care: Access to services, care gaps, and other barriers-A systematic review.
Synthesis in European journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Attributes Influencing Preferences for Treatments and Interventions in People With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS).Muscle & nerve · 2025Pooled it
- Inequities in neurological care: Access to services, care gaps, and other barriers-A systematic review.European journal of neurology · 2025Pooled it
- National mortality trends in polyneuropathies and other disorders of the peripheral nervous system in the United States, 1999-2023: a CDC WONDER database analysis.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- State-dependent repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in disorders of consciousness.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
- Addressing Variability and Bridging the Gap in Parkinson's Disease Care: A Call to Action.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2025Article
- A systematic review of developments in mHealth smartphone applications for Transgender and Gender Diverse individuals.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Bridging the Gaps: Addressing Inequities in Neurological Care for Underserved Populations.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Race- and place-based disparities in multiple sclerosis care: A qualitative study of patient experiences.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinicalArticle
- Portable neuroimaging and AI: democratizing brain diagnostics.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeHealth disparities and inequities are an important and too long overlooked public health concern worldwide. These differences in health and health care can affect people with any disease, including neurological disorders. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an updated overview of the main health inequities faced by neurological patients worldwide, to plan valuable interventions.
methodsMain databases were searched systematically. Quality was assessed with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. This review followed the standard guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
resultsA total of 1797 studies were obtained, of which 49 studies were included in the final round and subjected to quality appraisal. Quality assessment yielded scores ranging from 20% to 100%. The results were divided based on the nature of inequities: (i) socioeconomic disadvantage (n = 25); and (ii) access to care, treatment, and services inequities (n = 24). Most studies were conducted in high income counties (n = 46, 93.8%) and reported health inequities in persons with cerebrovascular diseases, especially stroke (n = 20, 40.8%), followed by multiple sclerosis (n = 8, 16.3%) and neurodegenerative disorders (n = 6, 12.2%).
conclusionsRacial and ethnic discrimination, economic issues, differences in disease management, educational level, and place of residence are the main inequities reported by neurological patients. The USA dominates the research panorama (n = 36, 73.4%), highlighting the need for more studies that cover other geopolitical contexts. Improving population health means improving health for everyone; however, historically disadvantaged groups continue to trail dramatically behind, and actions are needed to reduce the inequities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.