Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39583039›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2024

Evaluating Patient Experiences with Patient-Centered and Inclusive Care in Academic Obstetrics and Gynecology Outpatient Clinics.

Julia Bhuiyan, Charisse Loder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Julia BhuiyanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4865-9878
Charisse LoderDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring patient satisfaction is crucial in obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) care. This study aimed to assess patient satisfaction and experiences with respectful and culturally competent care in an institution's OB/GYN clinics following the initiation of diversity, equity, and inclusion programming. A survey was conducted from September 2021 to February 2022 among patients who had completed outpatient OB/GYN visits, focusing on staff and provider cultural competency, treatment discussion, clinic accommodations, and comfort during sensitive exams. Results from 246 participants indicated that most had positive interactions with clinic staff and healthcare providers. However, disparities emerged, with black or African American participants reporting lower satisfaction and a higher incidence of unfair treatment due to race. These findings highlight the need for additional educational endeavors to equip clinical care teams with skills for providing respectful, inclusive, and culturally competent care. Future qualitative research can further explore patient experiences with inclusive practices in OB/GYN care.

Indexed as

clinician-patient relationshipequitypatient feedbackpatient perspectives/narrativespatient/relationship-centeredpatient-reported experience measurespatient-reported outcome measurespatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID39583039
PMCPMC11583494

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.