Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39583177›Full record

ArticleKidney medicine2024

Nephroprotective Effects of Cilastatin in People at Risk of Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Dilaram Acharya, Fanar Ghanim, Tyrone G Harrison, Tayler Dawn Scory, Nusrat Shommu, Paul E Ronksley, Meghan J Elliott, David Collister, Neesh Pannu, Matthew T James

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06886464 (The Prevention of Nephrotoxin-Induced Acute Kidney Injury Using Cilastatin), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06886464 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Prevention of Nephrotoxin-Induced Acute Kidney Injury Using Cilastatin (PONTiAK) Trial: A Phase 2B Vanguard Design, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMatthew JamesRan2025 to 2029Enrolled698ConditionsAcute Kidney InjuryArmsCilastatin Sodium, Placebo-Saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dilaram AcharyaDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Fanar GhanimDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Tyrone G HarrisonDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Tayler Dawn ScoryDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Nusrat ShommuDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Paul E RonksleyDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Meghan J ElliottDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
David CollisterDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Canada.
Neesh PannuDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Canada.
Matthew T JamesDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rationale & Objective: Cilastatin is an inhibitor of drug metabolism in the proximal tubule that demonstrates nephroprotective effects in animals. It has been used in humans in combination with the antibiotic imipenem to block imipenem's renal metabolism. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the nephroprotective effects of cilastatin in humans. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational (comparative effectiveness) studies or randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Setting & Study Populations: People of any age at risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). Selection Criteria for Studies: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials registry from database inception to November 2023 for observational studies or RCTs that compared kidney outcomes among groups treated with cilastatin, either alone or as combination imipenem-cilastatin, versus an inactive or active control group not treated with cilastatin. Data Extraction: Two reviewers independently evaluated studies for inclusion and risk of bias. Analytical Approach: Treatment effects were estimated using random-effects models, and heterogeneity was quantified using the Results: We identified 10 studies (5 RCTs, n = 531 patients; 5 observational studies, n = 6,321 participants) that met the inclusion criteria, including 4 studies with comparisons to inactive controls and 6 studies with comparisons to alternate antibiotics. Based on pooled results from 7 studies, the risk of AKI was lower with imipenem-cilastatin (risk ratio [RR], 0.52; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.40-0.67; Limitations: Clinical and statistical heterogeneity could not be fully explained due to a limited number of studies. Conclusions: Patients treated with imipenem-cilastatin developed AKI less frequently and had lower serum creatinine concentration following treatment than control groups or those who had received comparator antibiotics. Larger clinical trials with less risk of detection bias due to lack of allocation concealment and blinding are needed to establish the efficacy of cilastatin for AKI prevention.

Indexed as

Kidney failurenephroprotective drugsnephrotoxicityrenal disease

Identifiers

PMID39583177
PMCPMC11582453

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.