ArticleCureus2024
Liver Status Assessment After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a common surgical intervention used to treat severe coronary artery disease. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score has become a widely used prognostic index for assessing the severity of liver disease and prioritizing liver transplantation. However, its utility in predicting outcomes in cardiac surgery procedures has not been extensively evaluated. Methods This retrospective study gathered data on patients who underwent CABG or CABG combined with other concomitant surgical interventions, such as carotid common or external carotid artery endarterectomy, thoracic aortic aneurysm repair, and aortic or mitral valve replacement or decalcification procedures, at a single tertiary care facility from January 2011 to December 2020. Researchers collected demographic, clinical, and laboratory information, including MELD score and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) data. The patients were divided into two groups: the first group included only those who underwent CABG, while the second group comprised patients who underwent CABG along with other concomitant cardiac interventions. Results The MELD score at discharge was significantly higher in the CABG and other interventions group compared to the CABG-only group (median = 14.09, IQR = 7.41-18.7 vs. median = 6.41, IQR = 4.61-9.44, p < 0.001). However, the difference in MELD score at admission between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.328). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically relevant, indicating that liver function worsened postoperatively in the patients with additional interventions. The EuroSCORE was also significantly higher in the CABG and other interventions group, suggesting a higher surgical risk as expected (median = 5.74, IQR = 3.54-11.47 vs. median = 3.34, IQR = 1.97-5.66, p < 0.001). Additionally, differences in laboratory parameters, especially coagulation and hemostasis indicators throughout the postoperative period, including the ICU stay (divided into four equal periods based on each patient's total ICU length of stay) and at discharge, indicate a more complex biological state in patients with additional interventions. These findings may have implications for perioperative management and long-term outcomes. Conclusions The elevated MELD score in patients undergoing CABG with additional interventions emphasizes the need for close monitoring of liver function and coagulation status. Evaluating hepatic status preoperatively would be beneficial, and incorporating liver-protective strategies could help mitigate postoperative repercussions. It may also be useful to include liver function parameters in existing cardiovascular risk scores to improve risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.