ArticleCureus2024
Detection of Protein Markers From Blood Samples of Cervical Cancer Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of serum Cytokeratin 5 and p63 as non-invasive biomarkers for the diagnosis and staging of cervical cancer: a case-control study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Cancer and Aging Biomarkers: Classification, Early Detection Technologies and Emerging Research Trends.Biosensors · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the prevalent cause of cervical cancer in females worldwide, necessitating the development of fast and reliable diagnostic methods for early detection of HPV. The study aims to detect serum proteins like squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA/SerpinB3), cytokeratin fragment antigen 21-1 (CYFRA 21-1), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and high mobility group box chromosomal protein 1 (HMGB1) as biomarkers and their combination concerning the type of HPV. Methods Serum samples from a total of 36 cervical cancer patients were initially subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), followed by western blotting with anti-Serpin B3/SCCA, anti-CEA, anti-HMGB, and anti-CYFRA 21-1. The frequency of samples for each protein was obtained. In the Chi-square test, correlations with p-values less than 0.05 were deemed statistically significant. Results Irrespective of HPV type, the CEA had the highest percentage of definite responses (58.33%). Subsequently, SCCA, HMGB1, and Cytokeratin-19 protein presented 47.22%, 27.78%, and 25% responses, respectively. HPV types influenced the difference in protein combinations, with HPV-16 presenting the most positive responses followed by HPV-(16+18). HPV-18 presented the least number of affirmative responses. Conclusion Our study presents the CEA protein as a possible biomarker and HPV-16 as the most prominent HPV type to different parallel combinations of serum proteins. The protein combinations can be applied to future cancer detection and therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.