Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39583576›Full record

ArticleAJOG global reports2024

Timing of cesarean section for prolonged labor in urban Tanzania: A criterion-based audit.

Monica Lauridsen Kujabi, Natasha Housseine, Idrissa Kabanda, Rukia Msumi, Luzango Maembe, Mtingele Sangalala, Manyanga Hudson, Sarah Hansen, Anna Macha, Brenda Sequeira D'mello and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJOG global reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Monica Lauridsen KujabiGlobal Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (Kujabi, Housseine, D'mello, Meyrowitsch, Konradsen, and Maaløe).
Natasha HousseineGlobal Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (Kujabi, Housseine, D'mello, Meyrowitsch, Konradsen, and Maaløe).
Idrissa KabandaMunicipal Hospitals of Ubungo (Sinza) and Temeke (Mbagala Rangitatu), Presidents Office, Regional and Local Government, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (Kabanda and Msumi).
Rukia MsumiMunicipal Hospitals of Ubungo (Sinza) and Temeke (Mbagala Rangitatu), Presidents Office, Regional and Local Government, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (Kabanda and Msumi).
Luzango MaembeRegional Referral Hospital (Temeke/Amana/Mwananyamala), Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (Maembe, Sangalala, and Hudson).
Mtingele SangalalaRegional Referral Hospital (Temeke/Amana/Mwananyamala), Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (Maembe, Sangalala, and Hudson).
Manyanga HudsonRegional Referral Hospital (Temeke/Amana/Mwananyamala), Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (Maembe, Sangalala, and Hudson).
Sarah HansenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark (Hansen).
Anna MachaMedical College East Africa, Aga Khan University, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (Housseine, Macha, D'mello, and Hussein).
Brenda Sequeira D'melloGlobal Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (Kujabi, Housseine, D'mello, Meyrowitsch, Konradsen, and Maaløe).
Dan Wolf MeyrowitschGlobal Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (Kujabi, Housseine, D'mello, Meyrowitsch, Konradsen, and Maaløe).
Flemming KonradsenGlobal Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (Kujabi, Housseine, D'mello, Meyrowitsch, Konradsen, and Maaløe).
Andreas Kryger JensenSection of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (Jensen).
Kidanto HusseinMedical College East Africa, Aga Khan University, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (Housseine, Macha, D'mello, and Hussein).
Nanna MaaløeGlobal Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (Kujabi, Housseine, D'mello, Meyrowitsch, Konradsen, and Maaløe).
Thomas van den AkkerAthena Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (van den Akker).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSimilar to many resource-constrained urban settings, cesarean deliveries in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, have increased rapidly, from 17% in 2015 to 26% in 2022. Alarmingly, at the population level, the increase was not followed by improvements in perinatal outcomes, suggesting the overuse of cesarean delivery. Prolonged labor is the leading cause of women's first cesarean delivery. Therefore, understanding the management of prolonged labor preceding cesarean delivery is crucial for preventing nonmedically indicated cesarean deliveries across Tanzania and globally.

objectiveThis study aimed to estimate the proportion of cesarean deliveries with a written indication of prolonged labor that was performed in labors with uncomplicated progression. STUDY

designThis study was conducted at 5 urban maternity units in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, from October 1, 2021, to August 31, 2022. Data were extracted from case files of women who gave birth via cesarean delivery with a written indication of prolonged labor. The timing of cesarean delivery decision was assessed against predefined definitions of prolonged labor at each stage/phase of labor. The proportion of cesarean deliveries performed in cases of uncomplicated progression was calculated. The exclusion criteria included referral to study sites because of prolonged labor or cervical dilatation of >6 cm upon admission, noncephalic presentation, multiple pregnancy, intrauterine fetal death, failed induction of labor, previous cesarean delivery, or other written indications for cesarean delivery.

resultsThe overall cesarean delivery rate was 32% (2949/9364). Of first-time cesarean delivery cases, 746 of 1517 patients (47.9%) had a written indication of prolonged labor. Finally, 456 of 746 patients (61.1%) met the inclusion criteria, of which 307 of 456 patients (67.3%) were admitted in the latent phase of labor. In 243 of 456 cesarean deliveries (53.3%) with an indication of prolonged labor, labor was not prolonged. This group included (1) women not being given a trial of labor (78/243 [32.1%]), (2) women in the first stage of active labor not crossing the partograph action line (145/243 [59.7%]), and (3) women in the second stage of labor lasting <1 hour (20/243 [8.2%]). Of note, 78 of 346 women (21.5%) in the first stage of active labor had a labor progression faster than 0.5 cm per hour preceding the decision for cesarean delivery.

conclusionAlmost half of cesarean deliveries in unscarred uteri were because of prolonged labor. Despite a written indication of prolonged labor, approximately half of the cases did not have prolonged labor. Although care in low-resource settings has traditionally been categorized as "too little, too late," this study finds care as "too much, too soon" in one of the world's fastest-growing urban areas. This finding highlights the inadequacy of one-size-fits-all approaches in curbing the increases in cesarean delivery occurring in (pockets of) low-resource settings. Our study calls for ways to respectfully allow more time for physiological labor progression in busy high-volume maternity units where many births occur.

Indexed as

childbirthdystociaguidelineslow-resource settingPartoMapregnancyTanzaniaurban

Identifiers

PMID39583576
PMCPMC11582455

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.