ArticleHeliyon2024
Streptococcus-mutans and Porphyromonas-gingivalis adhesion to glazed/polished surfaces of CAD/CAM restorations.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Streptococcus mutans adhesion to polished and glazed surfaces of three CAD/CAM ceramics: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Innovative Smart Materials in Restorative Dentistry.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Impact of Incorporating Nanoparticles to Adhesive Resin on the Demineralization of Enamel: A Systematic Review.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Determination of streptococcus mutans retention in acidic and neutral pH artificial saliva environment of all-ceramic materials with different surface treatment.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Dental restorations fabricated using CAD/CAM require modification/adjustment before cementation. Streptococcus mutans Materials and methods: Specimens (N = 75) from five test materials (n = 15 each) "Tetric-CAD®; IPS-e.max-CAD®; IPS-e.max-ZirCAD®; CELTRA-Duo® and Vita-Enamic®" were prepared in disc shape (10 × 3 mm) using CAD/CAM. The specimens underwent glazing and finishing/polishing using established procedures. The surface roughness was measured in micrometers (μm) using a profilometer. Bacterial adherence to test materials' glazed and finished/polished surfaces was tested using bacterial culture growth over the test materials. Data obtained was tabulated and statistical analysis performed using Kruskal Wallis test, post-hoc Conover test, Mann-Whitney Results: With the exception of IPS-e.max-ZirCAD®, which showed the contrary, the adherence of Conclusion: Glazed surfaces for majority of test materials demonstrated decreased adhesion from
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.