Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39584103›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Implications of baseline glycemic control by plasma glycated hemoglobin A1c on adverse outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus: Results from the PROMISE study.

Xiao-Fang Tang, Qin-Xue Li, Ya-Ling Han, Xiao-Zeng Wang, Ying Song, Zheng Zhang, Jing-Jing Xu, Zhen-Yu Liu, Yan Chen, Yong-Zhen Zhang and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Xiao-Fang TangDepartment of Cardiology, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Qin-Xue LiDepartment of Cardiology, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ya-Ling HanDepartment of Cardiology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
Xiao-Zeng WangDepartment of Cardiology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
Ying SongDepartment of Cardiology, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zheng ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Jing-Jing XuDepartment of Cardiology, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zhen-Yu LiuDepartment of Cardiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yan ChenDepartment of Cardiology, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yong-Zhen ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Pei ZhuDepartment of Cardiology, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xiao-Gang GuoDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Lin JiangDepartment of Cardiology, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zhi-Fang WangDepartment of Cardiology, Xinxiang Central Hospital, Xinxiang, China.
Ru LiuDepartment of Cardiology, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Qing-Sheng WangDepartment of Cardiology, The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, China.
Yi YaoDepartment of Cardiology, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ying-Qing FengDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Xue-Yan ZhaoDepartment of Cardiology, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jin-Qing YuanDepartment of Cardiology, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The optimal glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) target in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients remains controversial, especially in patients with concomitant coronary heart disease (CHD). This study aimed to investigate the correlation between baseline HbA1c and long-term prognosis in CHD patients with T2DM. Methods: The study enrolled 6,839 CHD patients with T2DM and measured HbA1c at admission in a multicenter prospective observational cohort. Patients were divided into two groups according to baseline HbA1c levels: optimal glycemic control group (HbA1c < 7.0 %, n = 3023) and poor glycemic control group (HbA1c ≥ 7.0 %, n = 3816). The study endpoints were all-cause death and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). Results: The median follow-up period was 2.1 years. During this period, 229 (3.3 %) all-cause deaths, 165 (2.4 %) cardiac deaths, and 759 (11.1 %) MACCEs occurred. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the incidences of all-cause death, cardiac death, non-fatal MI, unplanned revascularization, and MACCEs were significantly lower in the HbA1c < 7.0 % group than in the HbA1c ≥ 7.0 % group (P < 0.05). Multivariate Cox hazard analysis indicated that the incidences of all-cause death, cardiac death and MACCEs were significantly lower in the HbA1c < 7.0 % group compared to the HbA1c ≥ 7.0 % group [all-cause death: hazard ratio (HR) 1.969, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.421-2.729; cardiac death: HR 2.515, 95 % CI 1.647-3.839; MACCEs: HR 1.345, 95 % CI 1.150-1.573; P < 0.001]. Conclusions: Baseline HbA1c level was associated with all-cause death, cardiac death, and MACCEs in CHD patients with T2DM.

Indexed as

Adverse outcomesCoronary heart diseaseGlycemic controlGlycosylated hemoglobinType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID39584103
PMCPMC11585765

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.