Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39585484›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2024

Advances in Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma.

Kate E Therkelsen, Antonio Omuro

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kate E TherkelsenDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 875 Blake Wilbur, MC 6510, Stanford, Palo Alto, CA, 94305, USA. ktherk@stanford.edu.
Antonio OmuroDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 875 Blake Wilbur, MC 6510, Stanford, Palo Alto, CA, 94305, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewOptimal initial management can have a significant impact in long-term outcome in primary CNS lymphoma. This article reviews recent advances and the state of the field. RECENT

findingsGenomic analysis of CSF cell-free DNA has emerged as a new diagnostic tool for PCNSL. Treatment options have likewise evolved, with mature data from first-line chemotherapy-based prospective trials disclosing excellent results in younger (< 60-65) patients, with a cure achieved in a majority. However, results in older patients remain dismal, with several new salvage options under investigation including BTK pathway-targeted therapies, and CAR-T cell treatments. Meanwhile, low-dose radiation has emerged as an additional alternative for consolidation therapy. For younger PCNSL patients, the goal of treatment is now a cure, with the next frontier being the development of therapies affording optimized neurocognitive outcome and lower toxicity. Treatment for older patients remains however an unmet need, with several promising clinical trials ongoing.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System NeoplasmsHumansLymphomaBTK-Bruton tyrosine kinaseDLBCL – diffuse large B cell lymphomaHD-MTX – high-dose methotrexateM-RT – methotrexate-rituximab-temozolomidePrimary central nervous system lymphoma – PCNSLR-MVP – rituximab-methotrexate-vincristine-procarbazine

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.