Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39586049›Full record

ReviewNeurology2024

Clinical Outcome Assessments and Biomarkers in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease.

Brett A McCray, Vera Fridman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A class of deep intronicmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of a patient with autosomal recessive CharcotZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brett A McCrayFrom the Department of Neurology (B.A.M.), University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor; and Department of Neurology (V.F.), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.ORCID 0000-0001-6581-9728
Vera FridmanFrom the Department of Neurology (B.A.M.), University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor; and Department of Neurology (V.F.), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.

Funding

Defining TRPV4-mediated cytoskeletal changes that trigger pathological blood-neural barrier disruptionR01NS131402 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Brett Andrew McCray · 2024 to 2026
$1.4M
Pathogenesis of TRPV4-related peripheral neuropathyK08NS102509 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MCCRAY, BRETT ANDREW · 2018 to 2022
$997k
NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS102509NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS131402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) encompasses a diverse group of genetic forms of inherited peripheral neuropathy and stands as the most common hereditary neurologic disease worldwide. At present, no disease-modifying treatments exist for any form of CMT. However, promising therapeutic strategies are rapidly emerging, necessitating careful consideration of clinical outcome assessments (COAs) and clinical trial design. In this review, we discuss the challenges and successes over the past 2 decades in efforts to design and validate COAs and disease biomarkers of CMT. Natural history studies and completed clinical trials have underscored the limitations of early clinical scales for CMT, including the neuropathy impairment score, overall neuropathy limitation scale, and CMT neuropathy score. These studies prompted the development of newer, psychometrically supported scales including the CMT neuropathy score version 2, CMT pediatric scale, CMT infant scale, CMT functional outcome measure, and CMT health index. Although promising, many of these scales have yet to be formally tested in longitudinal studies. Given inherent challenges of relying solely on COAs in slowly progressive forms of CMT, there is growing recognition of the need for objective disease biomarkers that could serve as surrogate end points in clinical trials. Among these, MRI muscle fat fraction in the lower extremities has proven the most responsive biomarker to date, although its relationship to functional outcomes and its performance in treatment trials remain uncertain. Serum biomarkers including neurofilament light, transmembrane protease serine 5, specific microRNAs, neural cell adhesion molecule 1, and growth and differentiation factor 15 reliably distinguish patients with CMT from controls, but their responsiveness to effective therapies also remains unknown. Although the optimal combination of outcome measures in CMT has yet to be established, many of the most promising COAs and biomarkers are now being put to the test in ongoing clinical trials. These early studies will also help address other critical clinical trial considerations, such as patient selection and enrollment targets, which will become increasingly important in this exciting new era of bringing the first disease-modifying treatments to people living with CMT.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCharcot-Marie-Tooth DiseaseOutcome Assessment, Health CareClinical Trials as TopicHumansBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID39586049
PMCPMC11590233

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.