ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
Deep Learning-Based DCE-MRI Automatic Segmentation in Predicting Lesion Nature in BI-RADS Category 4.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application of deep learning technology in breast cancer: a systematic review of segmentation, detection, and classification approaches.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Immune infiltration differences underlying prognostic radiomics subtypes from matched MRI and RNA sequencing in patients with lower-grade gliomas.Discover oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate whether automatic segmentation based on DCE-MRI with a deep learning (DL) algorithm enabled advantages over manual segmentation in differentiating BI-RADS 4 breast lesions. A total of 197 patients with suspicious breast lesions from two medical centers were enrolled in this study. Patients treated at the First Hospital of Qinhuangdao between January 2018 and April 2024 were included as the training set (n = 138). Patients treated at Lanzhou University Second Hospital were assigned to an external validation set (n = 59). Areas of suspicious lesions were delineated based on DL automatic segmentation and manual segmentation, and evaluated consistency through the Dice correlation coefficient. Radiomics models were constructed based on DL and manual segmentations to predict the nature of BI-RADS 4 lesions. Meanwhile, the nature of the lesions was evaluated by both a professional radiologist and a non-professional radiologist. Finally, the area under the curve value (AUC) and accuracy (ACC) were used to determine which prediction model was more effective. Sixty-four malignant cases (32.5%) and 133 benign cases (67.5%) were included in this study. The DL-based automatic segmentation model showed high consistency with manual segmentation, achieving a Dice coefficient of 0.84 ± 0.11. The DL-based radiomics model demonstrated superior predictive performance compared to professional radiologists, with an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI 0.79-0.92). The DL model significantly reduced working time and improved efficiency by 83.2% compared to manual segmentation, further demonstrating its feasibility for clinical applications. The DL-based radiomics model for automatic segmentation outperformed professional radiologists in distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions in BI-RADS category 4, thereby helping to avoid unnecessary biopsies. This groundbreaking progress suggests that the DL model is expected to be widely applied in clinical practice in the near future, providing an effective auxiliary tool for the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.