ArticleScientific reports2024
ParaAntiProt provides paratope prediction using antibody and protein language models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Protein Language Models: Applications and Perspectives.Journal of proteome research · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence advancements in monoclonal antibody development technology.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- A comprehensive antigen-antibody complex database unlocking insights into interaction interface.eLife · 2025Article
- Nanobodies: From Discovery to AI-Driven Design.Biology · 2025Review
- DeepInterAware: Deep Interaction Interface-Aware Network for Improving Antigen-Antibody Interaction Prediction from Sequence Data.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Application of artificial intelligence large language models in drug target discovery.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- ParaDeep: sequence-based deep learning for residue-level paratope prediction using chain-aware BiLSTM-CNN models.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Efficiently predicting the paratope holds immense potential for enhancing antibody design, treating cancers and other serious diseases, and advancing personalized medicine. Although traditional methods are highly accurate, they are often time-consuming, labor-intensive, and reliant on 3D structures, restricting their broader use. On the other hand, machine learning-based methods, besides relying on structural data, entail descriptor computation, consideration of diverse physicochemical properties, and feature engineering. Here, we develop a deep learning-assisted prediction method for paratope identification, relying solely on amino acid sequences and being antigen-agnostic. Built on the ProtTrans architecture, and utilizing pre-trained protein and antibody language models, we extract efficient embeddings for predicting paratope. By incorporating positional encoding for Complementarity Determining Regions, our model gains a deeper structural understanding, achieving remarkable performance with a 0.904 ROC AUC, 0.701 F1-score, and 0.585 MCC on benchmark datasets. In addition to yielding accurate antibody paratope predictions, our method exhibits strong performance in predicting nanobody paratope, achieving a ROC AUC of 0.912 and a PR AUC of 0.665 on the nanobody dataset. Notably, our approach outperforms structure-based prediction methods, boasting a PR AUC of 0.731. Various conducted ablation studies, which elaborate on the impact of each part of the model on the prediction task, show that the improvement in prediction performance by applying CDR positional encoding together with CNNs depends on the specific protein and antibody language models used. These results highlight the potential of our method to advance disease understanding and aid in the discovery of new diagnostics and antibody therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.