Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39587358›Full record

ArticleNature methods2025

Global analysis of endogenous protein disorder in cells.

Shouxiang Zhang, Tze Cin Owyong, Oana Sanislav, Lukas Englmaier, Xiaojing Sui, Geqing Wang, David W Greening, Nicholas A Williamson, Andreas Villunger, Jonathan M White and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Shouxiang Zhang *Department of Biochemistry and Chemistry, La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Tze Cin Owyong *Department of Biochemistry and Chemistry, La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Oana SanislavDepartment of Microbiology, Anatomy, Physiology and Pharmacology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Lukas EnglmaierCeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0082-2616
Xiaojing SuiDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, Rice Institute for Biomedical Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6986-0509
Geqing WangDepartment of Biochemistry and Chemistry, La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
David W GreeningBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7516-485X
Nicholas A WilliamsonBio21 Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics Facility, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2173-3452
Andreas VillungerCeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8259-4153
Jonathan M WhiteSchool of Chemistry, Bio21 Institute, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0707-6257
Begoña HerasDepartment of Biochemistry and Chemistry, La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Wallace W H WongSchool of Chemistry, Bio21 Institute, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Paul R FisherDepartment of Microbiology, Anatomy, Physiology and Pharmacology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1884-6306
Yuning HongDepartment of Biochemistry and Chemistry, La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. y.hong@latrobe.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8085-1651

Funding

Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (ARC) DE170100058Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (ARC) FT210100271Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) APP1161803Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) APP2029017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disorder and flexibility in protein structures are essential for biological function but can also contribute to diseases, such as neurodegenerative disorders. However, characterizing protein folding on a proteome-wide scale within biological matrices remains challenging. Here we present a method using a bifunctional chemical probe, named TME, to capture in situ, enrich and quantify endogenous protein disorder in cells. TME exhibits a fluorescence turn-on effect upon selective conjugation with proteins with free cysteines in surface-exposed and flexible environments-a distinctive signature of protein disorder. Using an affinity-based proteomic approach, we identify both basal disordered proteins and those whose folding status changes under stress, with coverage to proteins even of low abundance. In lymphoblastoid cells from individuals with Parkinson's disease and healthy controls, our TME-based strategy distinguishes the two groups more effectively than lysate profiling methods. High-throughput TME fluorescence and proteomics further reveal a universal cellular quality-control mechanism in which cells adapt to proteostatic stress by adopting aggregation-prone distributions and sequestering disordered proteins, as illustrated in Huntington's disease cell models.

Indexed as

Intrinsically Disordered ProteinsProteomicsHumansHuntington DiseaseParkinson DiseaseProtein FoldingProteomeIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsProteome

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.