SynthesisBMC complementary medicine and therapies2024
Effects of Mentha on blood pressure: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMentha consumption may associated with blood pressure improvement in humans, but the recent evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed inconsistent results. The present study provides a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs to investigate the effect of Mentha on blood pressure.
methodsTo cover all relevant literature, a complete search was conducted across PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases before March 2024 using PRISMA guidelines. In addition, Google Scholar, SID databases, the reference lists of the related reviews, and meta-analyses were searched for this purpose. Also, a "snowball search" was applied to include other relevant trials that may have been missed. A random-effects model was used for quantitative data synthesis, with weight mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Standard methodologies were utilized to assess kappa statistics between the authors, GRADE evidence profiles, heterogeneity, meta-regression, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias.
resultsOut of 476 publications identified, seven RCTs were eligible and included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. There was perfect agreement in study selection between the reviewers (К statistic, 0.86; p < 0.001). Meta-analysis showed a 1.227 mmHg reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) (95% CI: -6.61,4.16, p = 0.655), 2.997 mmHg reduction in long-term SBP (95% CI: -8.00,2.00, p = 0.241), 1.830 mmHg reduction in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (95% CI: -5.06,1.40, p = 0.268), and 2.857 mmHg reduction in long-term DBP (95% CI: -6.01, 0.30, p = 0.076) after Mentha consumption in intervention group compared to control. In sub-group analysis, a statistically and clinically significant reduction in SBP and DBP was observed in the participants with ages above 30 years and in the participants with SBP > 130 mmHg or DBP > 80 mmHg.
conclusionsOur findings showed that Mentha consumption might not have a statistically significant effect on lowering SBP, DBP, long-term SBP, and long-term DBP. However, it can lead to a clinically significant reduction in both long-term SBP and long-term DBP. Besides, Mentha may have potential benefits for patients with pre-hypertension and hypertension. Nevertheless, further well-designed RCTs are needed to confirm our results. PROSPERO Registration No: CRD42023459490.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.