Evidence mapPaperPMID 39587613Full record

ArticleTrials2024

Reducing Exposures to Endocrine Disruptors (REED) study, a personalized at-home intervention program to reduce exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals among a child-bearing age cohort: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Johanna R Rochester, Carol F Kwiatkowski, Michael Kupec Lathrop, Iva Neveux, Eric J Daza, Joseph Grzymski, Jenna Hua

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07703046 (Endocrine Disruptors and Men's Reproductive Health), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07703046 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Endocrine Disruptors and Men's Reproductive Health: A Randomized Behavioral Intervention to Increase Environmental Health Literacy and Reduce Exposures Among Men With Low Semen Quality

TypeinterventionalSponsorMillion Marker Wellness, Inc.Ran2026 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsFertility, Male Fertility, Sperm Count, Low, Sperm QualityArmsEDC Education Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Johanna R RochesterMillion Marker Wellness, Inc, Berkeley, California, USA.
Carol F KwiatkowskiMillion Marker Wellness, Inc, Berkeley, California, USA.
Michael Kupec LathropMillion Marker Wellness, Inc, Berkeley, California, USA.
Iva NeveuxUniversity of Nevada, Reno, Reno, Nevada, USA.
Eric J DazaMillion Marker Wellness, Inc, Berkeley, California, USA.
Joseph GrzymskiUniversity of Nevada, Reno, Reno, Nevada, USA.
Jenna HuaMillion Marker Wellness, Inc, Berkeley, California, USA. jenna@millionmarker.com.

Funding

NIEHS NIH HHS R44 ES034312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExposures to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) have been linked to chronic diseases including breast cancer, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and infertility. Exposure during pregnancy may have a lifelong impact on the fetus. Services are needed to allow individuals to learn about their personal EDC exposures and how to reduce them. Million Marker (MM) aims to crowdsource and scale the biomonitoring of environmental chemicals and provide actionable results to empower individuals to proactively assess, track, and reduce their EDC exposures. In previous research, we developed and tested the first mobile EDC intervention service (mail-in urine testing and exposure report-back) for its efficacy in increasing EH literacy (EHL), willingness to reduce exposures (i.e., readiness to change, RtC), and system usability. After intervention, we found increased EHL, increased RtC in women (but not men), and decreased EDC exposure. However, some participants did not increase their RtC and had difficulty carrying out the intervention on their own. The reasons for these less optimal results were the difficulty in the EHL subject matter-participants still felt ill-prepared to apply their knowledge to making healthier lifestyle changes. Therefore, in this study, we will address these perceived limitations.

methodsWe will test a self-directed online interactive curriculum with live counseling sessions and individualized support modeled after the highly effective Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP). Recruiting from the Healthy Nevada Project (HNP), one of the largest population health cohorts in the world, we test the effectiveness of our EDC-specific online intervention curriculum via EHL and RtC surveys and determine changes in EDC exposure before and after intervention in a randomized controlled trial. We will also test for common clinical biomarkers via a commercially available at-home test (Siphox). We will recruit and randomize 300 women and 300 men of reproductive age (total n=600) from HNP. Our target population is men and women of reproductive age (18-44 years old). DISCUSSION: At the conclusion of this project, we will be well-positioned to scale our services to clinics and the general public, with the eventual aims of FDA approval, insurance coverage, and incorporation into routine clinical care.

Indexed as

Endocrine DisruptorsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdolescentAdultBiological MonitoringEnvironmental ExposureFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth LiteracyHumansMaleYoung AdultEndocrine Disruptors

Identifiers

PMID39587613
PMCPMC11587698

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.