Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39587728›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2024

Clinical Presentation and Long-Term Survival Outcomes of Patients With Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance (MGRS): A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

K Mancuso, R Mina, S Rocchi, E Antonioli, M T Petrucci, F Fazio, A Gozzetti, M Salvini, C S Cartia, G Bertuglia and 15 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

K MancusoIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1169-0129
R MinaMyeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Turin and Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria (AOU) Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy.
S RocchiIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Bologna, Italy.
E AntonioliHematology Department, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5547-3516
M T PetrucciHematology-Azienda Policlinico Umberto I-Department of Translational and Precision Medicine-Sapienza, University of Rome, Roma, Italy.
F FazioHematology-Azienda Policlinico Umberto I-Department of Translational and Precision Medicine-Sapienza, University of Rome, Roma, Italy.
A GozzettiDepartment of Medical Science, Surgery and Neuroscience, Hematology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0769-6891
M SalviniUOC Ematologia, ASST Sette Laghi, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy.
C S CartiaDivision of Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
G BertugliaMyeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Turin and Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria (AOU) Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy.
F PatriarcaClinica Ematologica, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Dipartimento di Medicina, Università di Udine, Udine, Italy.
A B Dalla PalmaHematology and BMT Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy.
S BarbatoIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7828-8230
G De CiccoIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Bologna, Italy.
F BigiIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Bologna, Italy.
E FaveroIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Bologna, Italy.
P TacchettiIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9576-5118
L PantaniIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Bologna, Italy.
I RizzelloIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8739-9266
M PuppiIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Bologna, Italy.
M TalaricoIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Bologna, Italy.
V SolliIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4828-6955
A KanapariDipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
M CavoIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Bologna, Italy.
E ZamagniIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Bologna, Italy.

Funding

Ministero della Salute RC-2024-2790170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMGRS are new rare clinical entities, whose recognition and optimal management is evolving.

methodsTo implement real-life data, we retrospectively analysed a multicentre cohort of 60 patients with renal biopsy-proven MGRS receiving mainly novel treatments (between 2006 and 2021) in eight Italian centres. Based on renal biopsy, patients were divided into two subgroups: AL amyloidosis (70%, n = 42) and other-MGRS (30%, n = 18).

resultsBaseline characteristics follow typical manifestations of MGRS disorders in terms of small clonal burden, laboratory and clinical features. More patients with AL amyloidosis had monotypic lambda light-chain disease, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 60 mL/min and nephrotic proteinuria than other-MGRS group. The most widely used drug was bortezomib, and about one-third of patients underwent ASCT. Overall response rate was 86% with no differences in the two subgroups. However, high-quality hematologic responses ≥very good partial response (VGPR) were greater in AL amyloidosis than in other-MGRS group (67% vs 28%, p = 0.015). The depth of haematological response influenced renal response, obtained in 32 (59%) of evaluable patients, similarly in the subgroups. Indeed, 75% patients with ≥ VGPR (p = 0.049) and none with stable disease (p ≤ 0.001) obtained a renal response. No association between renal response and histotypes (p = 0.9) or type of first-line therapy (p = 0.3) was found. At a median follow-up of 54.4 months (IQR 24.8-102.8), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 100.1 months (95% CI 34.9-NR), and median overall survival not reached (95% CI 129.8-NR). No significant difference emerged between the two groups in terms of survival outcomes. Achieving ≥ VGPR was confirmed as the main independent predictor of prolonged PFS in the general population (HR = 0.29, p = 0.023) and AL amyloidosis group (HR 0.23; p = 0.023). Preserved renal function at diagnosis was predictive of improved PFS in the AL amyloidosis group (eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min: HR = 0.003; p = 0.018; eGFR 30-60 mL/min: HR = 0.04, p = 0.046).

conclusionFurther research is warranted to develop standardised response criteria and treatment strategies to improve MGRS management.

Indexed as

Immunoglobulin Light-chain AmyloidosisAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyBortezomibFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansItalyKidneyKidney DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedParaproteinemiasRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBortezomib

Identifiers

PMID39587728
PMCPMC11588855

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.