ArticlePeerJ2024
Serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE) is associated with the overall survival of colorectal cancer: a retrospective study.
Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE) had been associated with survival of several cancers. However, its prognostic significance for colorectal cancer (CRC) has not been effectively discussed. We aimed to investigate the relationship between baseline serum NSE and the overall survival (OS) of colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRAD) patients. Methods: A retrospective study had been conducted by including 564 histopathology confirmed CRAD patients between January 2013 and December 2018 from Yunnan Provincial Cancer hospital, China. Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the crude and adjusted associations between serum NSE measured at diagnosis and the OS of the patients. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) was further applied to delineate dose-response trend of the NSE-OS association. Results: After controlling for possible confounding factors, baseline serum NSE was significantly associated with OS in CRAD: when dichotomizing by the median, patients with higher baseline serum NSE (NSE >= 12.93 ng/mL) were observed a worse prognosis (hazard ratio, HR: 1.82, 95% CI [1.30-2.55], Conclusions: Serum NSE measured at diagnosis might be a useful prognostic indicator for CRAD, especially for advanced stage patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.