ArticleERJ open research2024
Abnormal breathing pattern features in chronic refractory cough.
Article in ERJ open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic refractory cough (CRC) is a challenging condition that responds to speech pathology intervention. Clinical observation suggests abnormal breathing patterns occur in CRC and may be indirectly addressed as part of behavioural treatment, yet breathing pattern changes in CRC are poorly understood. The aims of this study were to 1) describe breathing patterns in patients with CRC, 2) compare breathing pattern features between patients with CRC and inducible laryngeal obstruction (ILO), and 3) estimate the effect of breathing pattern features on clinical measures of laryngeal sensory and motor dysfunction. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional observational study included 634 patients with CRC or ILO. A file audit of speech pathology assessment data was undertaken. Analysis of self-reported laryngeal symptoms ( Results: Most participants with CRC (73%) demonstrated at least one abnormal breathing pattern feature. The most common feature was thoracic breathing (69%) followed by oral breathing (33%). The type and prevalence of abnormal breathing patterns were similar between CRC and ILO. Abnormal breathing patterns were associated with reduced maximum phonation time (MPT); however, there was no association between these features and Newcastle Laryngeal Hypersensitivity Questionnaire scores. Conclusions: Abnormal breathing features are common in patients with CRC and are not significantly different from those occurring in ILO. There is some association between abnormal breathing features and MPT, suggesting impairment of laryngeal motor function. Conversely, there is no association between abnormal breathing features and laryngeal hypersensitivity.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.