Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39588317›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2024

Auditory processing up to cortex is maintained during sleep spindles.

Hugo R Jourde, Emily B J Coffey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Sleep State Influences Early Sound Encoding at Cortical But Not Subcortical Levels.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Neurophysiological effects of targeting sleep spindles with closed-loop auditory stimulation.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hugo R JourdeDepartment of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5004-101X
Emily B J CoffeyDepartment of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8249-7396

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sleep spindles are transient 11-16 Hz brain oscillations generated by thalamocortical circuits. Their role in memory consolidation is well established, but how they play a role in sleep continuity and protection of memory consolidation against interference is unclear. One theory posits that spindles or a neural refractory period following their offset act as a gating mechanism, blocking sensory information en route to the cortex at the level of the thalamus. An alternative model posits that spindles do not participate in the suppression of neural responses to sound, although they can be produced in response to sound. We present evidence from three experiments using electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography in humans that examine different evoked responses in the presence of and following sleep spindles. The results provide convergent empirical evidence suggesting that auditory processing up to cortex is maintained during sleep spindles, and their refractory periods.

Indexed as

auditory processingrefractory periodsleepsleep spindlesthalamic gating

Identifiers

PMID39588317
PMCPMC11586671

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.