ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2024
Enhancing type 2 diabetes mellitus prediction by integrating metabolomics and tree-based boosting approaches.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Changes in Cardiometabolic Risk Factors Following Nordic Walking in Adults with Prediabetes or Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pre-Post Interventions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- ML-BUSMetab: Machine Learning-Based Metabolomic Profiling for Predicting Aspirin Response in Colorectal Cancer Chemoprevention: A Multi-Model Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approach with External Validation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Beyond Feature Selection: Interpretable Machine Learning for Mechanistic Insights in Metabolomics.Biology · 2026Review
- Explainable Meta-Learning Ensemble Framework for Predicting Insulin Dose Adjustments in Diabetic Patients: A Comparative Machine Learning Approach with SHAP-Based Clinical Interpretability.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Application of AI and digital health tools in public health management of T2DM: from mechanism prediction to personalized treatment.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Identification of age-specific urinary metabolic biomarkers in Wilson disease using machine learning: a comparative study of ensemble tree models.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Classification of Cognitive Status in Community-Dwelling Sarcopenic Women: A SHAP-Based Analysis of Physical Activity and Anthropometric Factors.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based integration of pericoronary adipose tissue and clinical risk factors for cardiovascular risk prediction in type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Illuminating diabetesWorld journal of diabetes · 2025Review
- On Selecting Robust Approaches for Learning Predictive Biomarkers in Metabolomics Data Sets.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Emerging Insights into the Relationship Between Amino Acid Metabolism and Diabetic Cardiomyopathy.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Metabolomics uncovers the diabetes metabolic network: from pathophysiological mechanisms to clinical applications.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a global health problem characterized by insulin resistance and hyperglycemia. Early detection and accurate prediction of T2DM is crucial for effective management and prevention. This study explores the integration of machine learning (ML) and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) approaches based on metabolomics panel data to identify biomarkers and develop predictive models for T2DM. Methods: Metabolomics data from T2DM (n = 31) and healthy controls (n = 34) were analyzed for biomarker discovery (mostly amino acids, fatty acids, and purines) and T2DM prediction. Feature selection was performed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to enhance the model's accuracy and interpretability. Advanced three tree-based ML algorithms (KTBoost: Kernel-Tree Boosting; XGBoost: eXtreme Gradient Boosting; NGBoost: Natural Gradient Boosting) were employed to predict T2DM using these biomarkers. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used to explain the effects of metabolomics biomarkers on the prediction of the model. Results: The study identified multiple metabolites associated with T2DM, where LASSO feature selection highlighted important biomarkers. KTBoost [Accuracy: 0.938; CI: (0.880-0.997), Sensitivity: 0.971; CI: (0.847-0.999), Area under the Curve (AUC): 0.965; CI: (0.937-0.994)] demonstrated its effectiveness in using complex metabolomics data for T2DM prediction and achieved better performance than other models. According to KTBoost's SHAP, high levels of phenylactate (pla) and taurine metabolites, as well as low concentrations of cysteine, laspartate, and lcysteate, are strongly associated with the presence of T2DM. Conclusion: The integration of metabolomics profiling and XAI offers a promising approach to predicting T2DM. The use of tree-based algorithms, in particular KTBoost, provides a robust framework for analyzing complex datasets and improves the prediction accuracy of T2DM onset. Future research should focus on validating these biomarkers and models in larger, more diverse populations to solidify their clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.