Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39588749›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2024

Public Preference and Priorities for Including Vaccines in China's National Immunization Program: Discrete Choice Experiment.

Lingli Zhang, Xin Li, Jiali Chen, Xiaoye Wang, Yuyang Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Adverse Events FollowingVaccines · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lingli ZhangSchool of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7987-0217
Xin LiDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second People's Hospital of Changzhou, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3951-8061
Jiali ChenSchool of Health Policy and Management, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0009-0000-2101-1487
Xiaoye WangSchool of Health Policy and Management, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0009-0006-7962-5493
Yuyang SunSchool of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, 101 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing, 211166, China, 86 025 86868467.ORCID 0009-0004-0331-2533

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Several important vaccines, such as the Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine, rotavirus vaccine, pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, and influenza vaccine, have not been included in China's National Immunization Program (NIP) due to a prolonged absence of updates and limited resources. Public engagement could identify concerns that require attention and foster trust to ensure continuous support for immunization. Objective: This study aimed to identify public preferences for vaccine inclusion in the NIP and to determine the desired vaccine funding priorities in the Chinese population. Methods: A dual-response discrete choice experiment was utilized to estimate the relative importance of 6 attributes, including incidence of vaccine-preventable diseases, mortality of vaccine-preventable diseases, vaccine effectiveness, vaccine cost, vaccinated group, and vaccine coverage. Participants were recruited through the Wenjuanxing platform using a census-based quota sample of the nationwide population aged 18 years and older. A mixed logit model was used to estimate the coefficient of attribute preferences and predict the selection probability. Subgroups and interaction effects were analyzed to examine the heterogeneity in preferences. Results: In total, 1258 participants completed the survey, of which 880 were involved in the main analysis and 1166 in the sensitivity analysis. The relative importance and model estimates of 2 attributes, vaccine cost and vaccination group, varied between the unforced- and forced-choice settings. All 6 vaccine attributes significantly influenced the preferences for vaccine inclusion, with vaccine effectiveness and coverage as the most important factors, followed by the vaccinated group and mortality of vaccine-preventable diseases in the unforced-choice settings. The top vaccines recommended for China's NIP included the varicella vaccine, Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine, enterovirus 71 vaccine, and influenza vaccine for preschoolers and school-aged children. The current analysis also revealed distinct preference patterns among different subgroups, such as gender, age, education, and income. The interaction analysis indicated that the region and health status of participants contribute to preference heterogeneity. Conclusions: Public preferences for including vaccines in the NIP were primarily influenced by vaccine effectiveness and coverage. The varicella vaccine should be prioritized for inclusion in the NIP. The public preferences could provide valuable insights when incorporating new vaccines in the NIP.

Indexed as

Immunization ProgramsAdolescentAdultAgedChinaChoice BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPublic OpinionSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccinesYoung AdultVaccinesChinadiscrete choice experimentheterogeneityimmunizationinfectious diseasesmixed logit modelnational immunization programpublic healthpublic preferencesvaccinationvaccinesvaricella

Identifiers

PMID39588749
PMCPMC11611798

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.