ArticleThe ISME journal2025
Spatial sensing as a strategy for public goods regulation by gut microbes.
Article in The ISME journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Why probiotics fail: gut niche tension as the missing variable?Gut microbes · 2026Review
- Individual-based modeling unravels spatial and social interactions in bacterial communities.The ISME journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The gut microbiota has evolved in a complex, spatially structured environment, where microbial interactions are shaped by host-secreted molecules. We propose the spatial sensing (SS) hypothesis, which posits that gut microbes regulate costly cooperative traits, such as public goods, based on their proximity to the epithelial layer. First, we explore the evolutionary dynamics and selective pressures that could drive the emergence of SS. We then outline the spatial organization of the gut microbiota, emphasizing diffusion gradients of host-secreted molecules that may serve as positional cues. Depending on the cost-benefit ratio of secreting public goods near the epithelium, we propose two SS regulatory strategies: SS Type I, where production is suppressed in high-cost, low-benefit conditions, and SS Type II, where production is upregulated in nutrient-rich regions where benefits outweigh costs. We evaluate these strategies using an individual-based model simulating microbial competition in the gut environment. Our results show that SS regulation enhances microbial fitness by modulating investment in costly traits according to spatially varying costs and benefits, outperforming constitutive production. Our findings highlight that SS is both beneficial and evolutionarily feasible, as host-secreted molecules create spatial gradients that microbes can exploit for regulatory purposes. By incorporating spatial positioning as an additional regulatory cue, SS could complement quorum sensing (QS) and competition sensing (CS), fine-tuning the expression of costly traits when and where they are most beneficial within the gut environment. This perspective offers new insights into host-microbiota interactions and could inform strategies for modulating gut microbiomes in health and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.