Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39589669›Full record

ReviewEJNMMI research2024

Machine learning for prognostic prediction in coronary artery disease with SPECT data: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Vedat Cicek, Ezgi Hasret Kozan Cikirikci, Mert Babaoğlu, Almina Erdem, Yalcin Tur, Mohamed Iesar Mohamed, Tufan Cinar, Hatice Savas, Ulas Bagci

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EJNMMI research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. AI in SPECT Imaging: Opportunities and Challenges.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vedat CicekMachine & Hybrid Intelligence Lab, Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, 737 N. Michigan Avenue Suite 1600, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. Vedat.cicek@northwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3763-0570
Ezgi Hasret Kozan CikirikciDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Halic University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mert BabaoğluSultan II. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Health Sciences University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Almina ErdemSultan II. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Health Sciences University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Yalcin TurMachine & Hybrid Intelligence Lab, Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, 737 N. Michigan Avenue Suite 1600, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Mohamed Iesar MohamedDepartment of Medicine, University of Maryland Midtown Campus, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Tufan CinarDepartment of Medicine, University of Maryland Midtown Campus, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Hatice SavasDepartment of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ulas BagciMachine & Hybrid Intelligence Lab, Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, 737 N. Michigan Avenue Suite 1600, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.

Funding

Data Coordinating Center for the Type 1 Diabetes in Acute Pancreatitis ConsortiumU01DK127384 · NIDDK · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI Vernon M Chinchilli, Temel Tirkes · 2020 to 2026
$21.3M
Cyst-X: Interpretable Deep Learning Based Risk Stratification of Pancreatic Cystic TumorsR01CA246704 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA · PI BAGCI, ULAS · 2020 to 2024
$2.4M
Radiologist-Centered Artificial Intelligence (RCAI) for Lung Cancer Screening and DiagnosisR01CA240639 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BAGCI, ULAS · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
Hybrid Intelligence for Trustable Diagnosis And Patient Management of Prostate Cancer (HIT-PIRADS)U01CA268808 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Ulas Bagci · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health CA240639Foundation for the National Institutes of Health R01-CA246704Foundation for the National Institutes of Health U01-CA268808Foundation for the National Institutes of Health U01-DK127384-02S1NCI NIH HHS R01 CA240639NCI NIH HHS R01 CA246704NCI NIH HHS U01 CA268808NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK127384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSingle-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) analysis relies on qualitative visual assessment or semi-quantitative measures like total perfusion deficit that play a critical role in the non-invasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease by assessing regional blood flow abnormalities. Recently, machine learning (ML) -based analysis of SPECT images for coronary artery disease diagnosis has shown promise, with its utility in predicting long-term patient outcomes (prognosis) remaining an active area of investigation. In this review, we comprehensively examine the current landscape of ML-based analysis of SPECT imaging with an emphasis on prognostication of coronary artery disease. MAIN BODY: Our systematic search yielded twelve retrospective studies, investigating SPECT-based ML models for prognostic prediction in coronary artery disease patients, with a total sample size of 73,023 individuals. Several of these studies demonstrate the superior prognostic capabilities of ML models over traditional logistic regression (LR) models and total perfusion deficit, especially when incorporating demographic data alongside SPECT imaging. Meta-analysis of 6 studies revealed promising performance of the included ML models, with sensitivity and specificity exceeding 65% for major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Notably, the integration of demographic information with SPECT imaging in ML frameworks shows statistically significant improvements in prognostic performance.

conclusionOur review suggests that ML models either independently or in combination with demographic data enhance prognostic prediction in coronary artery disease.

Indexed as

Coronary artery diseaseMachine learningMPIPrognosisSPECT

Identifiers

PMID39589669
PMCPMC11599514

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.