ReviewBiosensors2024
Recent Advance in Single-Molecule Fluorescent Biosensors for Tumor Biomarker Detection.
Review in Biosensors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic and prognostic value of lncSPATA8-AS1 in prostate cancer and its regulatory effect on tumor progression.Cancer biology & therapy · 2026Article
- Application of Quantum Dot Multimodal Imaging in Early Disease Diagnosis.Journal of fluorescence · 2026Review
- Nanotechnology-Assisted Molecular Profiling: Emerging Advances in Circulating Tumor DNA Detection.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Point-of-care molecular diagnostics and drug-resistance mechanisms in neglected infectious diseases: current advances and future therapeutic opportunities.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The construction of biosensors for specific, sensitive, and rapid detection of tumor biomarkers significantly contributes to biomedical research and early cancer diagnosis. However, conventional assays often involve large sample consumption and poor sensitivity, limiting their further application in real samples. In recent years, single-molecule biosensing has emerged as a robust tool for detecting and characterizing biomarkers due to its unique advantages including simplicity, low sample consumption, ultra-high sensitivity, and rapid assay time. This review summarizes the recent advances in the construction of single-molecule biosensors for the measurement of various tumor biomarkers, including DNAs, DNA modifications, RNAs, and enzymes. We give a comprehensive review about the working principles and practical applications of these single-molecule biosensors. Additionally, we discuss the challenges and limitations of current single-molecule biosensors, and highlight the future directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.