ReviewTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2024
A Review of Factors Affecting Radiation Dose and Image Quality in Coronary CTA Performed with Wide-Detector CT.
Review in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A wide-detector CT protocol for one-stop cardio-cerebrovascular angiography: a technical feasibility study comparing an integrated protocol with conventional two-scan approach.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Article
- Multimodal diagnostic imaging for early mitral valve disease: integration of current and emerging modalities-a narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2025Review
- Feasibility of alternative trigger deletion to improve 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography quality in patients with increased heart rate.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Trading off Iodine and Radiation Dose in Coronary Computed Tomography.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Compared with traditional invasive coronary angiography (ICA), coronary CT angiography (CCTA) has the advantages of being rapid, economical, and minimally invasive. The wide-detector CT, with its superior temporal resolution and robust three-dimensional reconstruction technology, thus enables CCTA in patients with high heart rates and arrhythmias, leading to a high potential for clinical application. This paper systematically summarizes wide-detector CT hardware configurations of various vendors routinely used for CCTA examinations and reviews the effects of patient heart rate and heart rate variability, scanning modality, reconstruction algorithms, tube voltage, and scanning field of view on image quality and radiation dose. In addition, novel technologies in the field of CT applied to CCTA examinations are also presented. Since this examination has a diagnostic accuracy that is highly consistent with ICA, it can be further used as a routine examination tool for coronary artery disease in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.