Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39591640›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2025

Acceptability, Feasibility, and Uptake of COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Diagnostic Self-Testing at the Community Level in Tanzania.

Grace W Mwangoka, Ali M Ali, Mwifadhi Mrisho, Abdallah Mkopi, Muhidin Mahende, Hajirani M Msuya, Silas G Temu, Paul Kazyoba, Michael G Mihayo, Omar Juma and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Grace W MwangokaIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Ali M AliIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Mwifadhi MrishoIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Abdallah MkopiIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Muhidin MahendeIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Hajirani M MsuyaIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Silas G TemuIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Paul KazyobaNational Institute for Medical Research, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Michael G MihayoIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Omar JumaIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Ali HamadIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Said A JongoIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Omar LwenoIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Anneth TumboIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Sara S MswataIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Anne HoppeFIND, Geneva, Switzerland.
Pallavi DaniFIND, Geneva, Switzerland.
Salim AbdullaIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is critical for comprehensive public health response strategies, and self-testing with antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) presents opportunities to test in hard-to-reach communities. Therefore, we evaluated the acceptability, feasibility, and uptake of Ag-RDT self-testing at the community level in Tanzania. From June to October 2022, symptomatic individuals or those with recent contact with a known or suspected COVID-19 patient were offered assisted testing and self-testing within mining communities and at transport hubs. This study included a cross-sectional survey before and after implementation. Participants were assessed for their acceptability and uptake of the nasal Ag-RDT self-test and their preference for nasal Ag-RDT self-testing. The survey data were collected in Open Data Kit, whereas the Ag-RDT results in the community were recorded by using the COVISUSPECT Mobile Application. Data analysis was performed by using STATA and R Statistical Software. A total of 538 individuals were screened, and 454 (84.4%) consented to be tested. The preference for self-testing was relatively low (33%), and the majority of participants (67%) opted to be assisted by a healthcare professional. Of the participants who opted for testing, 149 (32.8%) were able to self-test. Generally, there was no major difference in the various assessed parameters between the baseline and end-line surveys. The results from fitting multiple logistic regression indicated that after controlling for age, participants living in Dodoma were significantly less likely to opt for self-testing (odds ratio = 0.54; P-value = 0.023) compared with those living in Dar es Salaam. There was no significant difference in self-testing between participants living in Mara and those living in Dar es Salaam (odds ratio = 0.7; P-value = 0.179). After controlling for region, older (≥40 years) participants were significantly less likely to self-test compared with participants aged 18 to <40 years (odds ratio = 0.47; P-value = 0.002). The intervention was well-accepted in all areas in which Ag-RDTs were deployed. Our findings can therefore support the Ministry of Health by increasing accessibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 testing in the hard-to-reach communities in response to the next COVID-19 wave.

Indexed as

Antigens, ViralCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingPatient Acceptance of Health CareSARS-CoV-2Self-TestingAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRapid Diagnostic TestsAntigens, Viral

Identifiers

PMID39591640
PMCPMC11965726

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.